Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 5,565

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Method for Determining the Sedimentation Behavior of Enzymes: Application to Protein Mixtures

Open access
Martin, Robert G., Ames, Bruce N.·1961·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

During an investigation of the gene-enzyme relationships in histidine biosynthesis in Xalmonella typhimurium, it became desirable to determine, in crude extracts, the approximate molecular weights of several enzymes. We have found sucrose gradient centrifugation to be a suitable method for determining sedimentation coefficients of enzymes in protein mixtures. A variety of enzymes of known properties have been studied in the development of the method. Although the separation cell of Yphantis and Waugh (1) has been demonstrated to be applicable to the determination of molecular weights when multiprotein solutions are used, the present method has several advantages over that system and these advantages will be discussed. Sucrose gradient centrifugation, using the swinging bucket head of the preparative ultracentrifuge, has been used extensively in the determination of sedimentation constants of viruses, mitochondria, microsomes, and ribosomes (2, 3). The adaptation of this method to relatively low molecular weight substances is reported here. In the sucrose gradient technique the sample to be studied is layered on a gradient and materials of different sedimentation properties separate from each other during the centrifugation. A hole is then punched in the bottom of the centrifuge tube and fractions are collected and analyzed. With slight modifications in the design of the apparatus for gradient production and fractionation, we have found the method to be simple and accurate. Sedimentation coefficients have been determined for a number of well characterized enzymes as well as a sample of ribonucleic acid, and the results are in good agreement with the values reported by others. The same values have been obtained whether the enzymes were analyzed as pure proteins or mixed with crude extracts. Although sedimentation coefficients were directly calculated for a variety of substances in order to determine the accuracy of the method, in general use the procedure may be simplified. The sedimentation coefficient (or approximate molecular weight) of an unknown enzyme may be determined by a simple ratio of mobilities when a standard well characterized enzyme has been added to the protein mixture. With the use of this technique the sedimentation behavior of several of the enzymes in the pathway of histidine biosynthesis in S. typhimurium has been determined.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)64180-8

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 5,565

Metadata

Authors
Martin, R. G., & Ames, B. N.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1961-05
Volume
236
Issue
5
Pages
1372-1379
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1611482599
Cited by
5,565
References
1
FWCI
43.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Method for Determining the Sedimentation Behavior of Enzymes: Application to Protein Mixtures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)64180-8
The paper
Martin, R. G., & Ames, B. N. (1961). A Method for Determining the Sedimentation Behavior of Enzymes: Application to Protein Mixtures. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)64180-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.