Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 325

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

N-ACETYL-l-ASPARTIC ACID IN BRAIN

Open access
Tallan, Harris H., Moore, Stanford, Stein, William H.·1956·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

In recent studies on the amino acids and related compounds present in protein-free extracts of cat tissues (l), a relatively large amount of bound aspartic acid was found in the extract from brain. Acid hydrolysis of the extract liberated about 80 mg. of aspartic acid per 100 gm. of tissue, less than 2 per cent of which could have arisen from asparagine. The bound aspartic acid in brain represented the largest quantity of conjugated amino acid of unknown nature found in any of the tissue extracts examined. The isolation of this conjugate and its identification as N-acetyl-n-aspartic acid form the subject of this communication. Since there were no major unidentified ninhydrin-positive peaks on the effluent curve obtained from the extract of brain, it could be concluded that the conjugated amino acid was present in an N-substituted and ninhydrin-negative form. In order to locate compounds of this type in the effluent from the ion exchange columns, aliquots were removed from the fractions for direct ninhydrin analysis and for analysis after acid hydrolysis. In this manner, a relatively large amount of material, which was ninhydrin-positive after hydrolysis, was found in a peak emerging at about 60 effluent ml., just preceding phosphoethanolamine (cf. Fig. 1 (1)). Amino acid analysis of a hydrolyzed sample from this peak showed that it contained nearly all of the conjugated aspartic acid of the brain; 87 per cent of the ninhydrin color of the hydrolysate arose from aspartic acid, and the amount of this amino acid corresponded to 74 mg. per 100 gm. of tissue. The presence of small amounts of glutamic acid, serine, cystine, and tyrosine in the hydrolysate indicated that the compound was not present in a completely pure form. Since the derivative was eluted rapidly from the Dowex 50 column, it appeared likely that the conjugate was an acidic compound and could probably be chromatographed more effectively by using a column of a basic resin, such as Dowex 2-X4, as had been done with phenylacetylglutamine (2) and tyrosine-O-sulfate (3). When an extract of cat brain was chromatographed on a 0.9 X 15 cm. column of Dowex 2-X4, the effluent curve shown in Fig. 1 was obtained. The peak at about 90 ml. was completely ninhydrin-negative before hydrolysis, and the amino acid content of a hydrolysate showed aspartic acid to be the only amino acid present. Rechromatography of a sample from the Dowex 2 experiment on a column

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)65789-8

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 325

Metadata

Authors
Tallan, H. H., Moore, S., & Stein, W. H.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1956-03
Volume
219
Issue
1
Pages
257-264
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2096438243
Cited by
325
References
0
FWCI
2.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: N-ACETYL-l-ASPARTIC ACID IN BRAIN. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)65789-8
The paper
Tallan, H. H., Moore, S., & Stein, W. H. (1956). N-ACETYL-l-ASPARTIC ACID IN BRAIN. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)65789-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.