Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 339

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantitative neuropathology by high resolution magic angle spinning proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy

Open access
Cheng, L. L., Ma, M. J., Becerra, L., Ptak, T., Tracey, I., Lackner, A., González, R. G.·1997·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

We describe a method that directly relates tissue neuropathological analysis to medical imaging. Presently, only indirect and often tenuous relationships are made between imaging (such as MRI or x-ray computed tomography) and neuropathology. We present a biochemistry-based, quantitative neuropathological method that can help to precisely quantify information provided by in vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy ( 1 HMRS), an emerging medical imaging technique. This method, high resolution magic angle spinning (HRMAS) 1 HMRS, is rapid and requires only small amounts of unprocessed samples. Unlike chemical extraction or other forms of tissue processing, this method analyzes tissue directly, thus minimizing artifacts. We demonstrate the utility of this method by assessing neuronal damage using multiple tissue samples from differently affected brain regions in a case of Pick disease, a human neurodegenerative disorder. Among different regions, we found an excellent correlation between neuronal loss shown by traditional neurohistopathology and decrease of the neuronal marker N -acetylaspartate measured by HRMAS 1 HMRS. This result demonstrates for the first time, to our knowledge, a direct, quantitative link between a decrease in N -acetylaspartate and neuronal loss in a human neurodegenerative disease. As a quantitative method, HRMAS 1 HMRS has potential applications in experimental and clinical neuropathologic investigations. It should also provide a rational basis for the interpretation of in vivo 1 HMRS studies of human neurological disorders.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.94.12.6408

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 339

Metadata

Authors
Cheng, L. L., Ma, M. J., Becerra, L., Ptak, T., Tracey, I., Lackner, A., & González, R. G.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1997-06-10
Volume
94
Issue
12
Pages
6408-6413
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2121817566
Cited by
339
References
23
FWCI
10.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative neuropathology by high resolution magic angle spinning proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.94.12.6408
The paper
Cheng, L. L., Ma, M. J., Becerra, L., Ptak, T., Tracey, I., Lackner, A., & González, R. G. (1997). Quantitative neuropathology by high resolution magic angle spinning proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.12.6408

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.