Cited by 293Protein Structure and DynamicsProtein purification and stabilityAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Human apolipoprotein E3 in aqueous solution. I. Evidence for two structural domains.

Open access
Wetterau, J R, Aggerbeck, L P, Rall, S C, Weisgraber, K H·1988·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

The stability and structure of human apolipoprotein (apo) E3 in aqueous solution were investigated by guanidine HCl denaturation and limited proteolysis. The guanidine HCl denaturation curve, as monitored by circular dichroism spectroscopy, was biphasic; the two transition midpoints occurred at 0.7 and 2.5 M guanidine HCl, indicating that there are stable intermediate structures in the unfolding of apoE. Limited proteolysis of apoE with five enzymes demonstrated two proteolytically resistant regions, an amino-terminal domain (residues 20-165) and a carboxyl-terminal domain (residues 225-299). The region between them was highly susceptible to proteolytic cleavage. Because of their similarity to the proteolytically resistant regions, the amino-terminal (residues 1-191) and carboxyl-terminal (residues 216-299) thrombolytic fragments of apoE were used as models for the two domains. Guanidine HCl denaturation of the carboxyl- and amino-terminal fragments gave transition midpoints of 0.7 and 2.4 M guanidine HCl, respectively. The results establish that the two domains identified by limited proteolysis correspond to the two domains detected by protein denaturation experiments. Therefore, the thrombolytic fragments are useful models for the two domains. The free energies of denaturation calculated from the denaturation curves of intact apoE or the model domains were approximately 4 and 8-12 kcal/mol for the carboxyl- and amino-terminal domains, respectively. The value for the carboxy…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)68778-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 42 · Cited by 293

Authors
Wetterau, J. R., Aggerbeck, L. P., Rall, S. C., & Weisgraber, K. H.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1988-05
Volume
263
Issue
13
Pages
6240-6248
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1529259401
Cited by
293
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL 18577-11)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
apolipoprotein E3, protein structure, structural domains, guanidine hydrochloride denaturation, limited proteolysis, N-terminal domain, C-terminal domain, hinge region, protein stability, apolipoproteins
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Apolipoproteins E, Circular Dichroism, Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel, Guanidines, Humans, Hydrolysis, Protein Conformation, Protein Denaturation, Solutions, Time Factors, Guanidine, Apolipoprotein E3

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review