The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE ASSAY OF ANIMAL TISSUES FOR RESPIRATORY ENZYMES
Open accessAbstract
Until methods for the assay of animal tissues for specific respiratory enzymes have been developed, the brilliant and fundamental researches of Warburg, Meyerhof, Cori, and others cannot be applied to the various aspects of metabolism. By means of the homogenization technique of Potter and Elvehjem (2), it is possible to disperse cellular components so widely that endogenous respiration is virtually stopped due to dilution effects (2), after which particular phases of metabolism may be restored by the addition of the appropriate substrates and soluble cofactors.’ The goal is to isolate a particular reaction and, by so doing, to determine quantitatively the specific enzyme which catalyzes the reaction, rather than to effect a partial isolation of the enzymes by means of fractionations in which the over-all yield is never determined. In the case of the respiratory enzymes, the situation is complicated by the fact that the reaction occurs through the mediation of a series of enzymes, all of which are necessary to obtain oxygen uptake. We have previously presented a method for the quantitative determination of cytochrome c (1) in animal tissues. It was possible in that instance to express the resuhs on an absolute basis; i.e., in gm. or moIes per unit of tissue. In the case of most of the respiratory enzymes, there is no way of expressing the results on an absolute basis, since the measurement is in terms of catalytic effect, and the results must be expressed in the same terms, since no standards are available for comparison. However, by expressing the results in terms of the conventional fJo2, one may compare the results directly with measurements made on tissue slices. This cannot be done when succinic dehydrogenase is measured by the methylene blue technique (3).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A MODIFIED METHOD FOR THE STUDY OF TISSUE OXIDATIONS
Potter, V. R., & Elvehjem, C. A. (1936) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)74822-9 · Cited by 653
Self-citationSTUDIES ON THE MECHANISM OF HYDROGEN TRANSPORT IN ANIMAL TISSUES
POTTER, V. R., & DuBois, K. P. (1943) · The Journal of General Physiology · doi:10.1085/jgp.26.4.391 · Cited by 121
Self-citationTHE ESTIMATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF CYTOCHROME OXIDASE AND CYTOCHROME C IN RAT TISSUES
Stotz, E. H. (1939) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)73453-4 · Cited by 89
Cited by
Primary Hepatocyte Isolation and Cultures: Technical Aspects, Challenges and Advancements
Kaur, I., Vasudevan, A., Rawal, P., Tripathi, D. M., Ramakrishna, S., Kaur, S., & Sarin, S. K. (2023) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering10020131 · Cited by 64
The inhibitory effects of itaconic acid in vitro and in vivo
Booth, A. N., Taylor, J., Wilson, R. H., & DeEds, F. (1952) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)55778-1 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Schneider, W. C., & Potter, V. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1943-07
- Volume
- 149
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 217-227
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W122722010
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE ASSAY OF ANIMAL TISSUES FOR RESPIRATORY ENZYMES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)72232-1
- The paper
- Schneider, W. C., & Potter, V. R. (1943). THE ASSAY OF ANIMAL TISSUES FOR RESPIRATORY ENZYMES. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)72232-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.