The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A MODIFIED METHOD FOR THE STUDY OF TISSUE OXIDATIONS
Open accessAbstract
There are two common methods for preparing animal tissues for oxygen uptake studies; namely, the “slice technique” and the “mince technique.” In the former method the tissues are cut into thin slices about 0.3 mm. thick, care being taken to damage the tissues as little as possible. In the latter method no precautions are taken to avoid damage to the tissues, which are either run through a mechanical mincer (l), cut into fine pieces with scissors (2), or even mashed with a bone spatula (3). Dixon and Elliott (1) stated that the same results were obtained by both the slice and the mince technique, but Elliott and coworkers (4) have since adopted extreme precautions to prevent damage to the tissue, and recommend the slice technique. These workers showed that in a majority of cases the oxygen uptake of minced tissue suspensions was much inferior to that of tissue slices. The present communication describes a new method for the study of tissue oxidations, which involves (a) the rapid preparation of homogenized tissue suspensions by means of a simple apparatus, and (b) the measurement of the oxygen uptake of the suspension in various dilutions. The new technique for the preparation of the tissue,suspension differs from mince techniques in that the tissues are broken down while in a buffer medium, and without contamination, inasmuch as the homogenizer is made entirely of glass. It is also possible to have no loss in temperature from the time the animal is killed until the suspensions are in the apparatus.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Assay of intestinal disaccharidases
Dahlqvist, A. (1968) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(68)90263-7 · Cited by 1,205
Palmer, J. W., Tandler, B., & Hoppel, C. L. (1977) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(19)75283-1 · Cited by 829
Further Observations on Penicillin
Abraham, E. P., Chain, E., Fletcher, C. M., Gardner, A. D., Heatley, N. G., Jennings, M. A., & Florey, H. W. (1941) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)72122-2 · Cited by 821
Deter, R. L., & de Duve, C. (1967) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.33.2.437 · Cited by 538
THE ASSAY OF ANIMAL TISSUES FOR RESPIRATORY ENZYMES
Schneider, W. C., & Potter, V. R. (1943) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)72232-1 · Cited by 364
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Potter, V. R., & Elvehjem, C. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1936-06
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 495-504
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W127493116
- Cited by
- 653
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A MODIFIED METHOD FOR THE STUDY OF TISSUE OXIDATIONS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)74822-9
- The paper
- Potter, V. R., & Elvehjem, C. A. (1936). A MODIFIED METHOD FOR THE STUDY OF TISSUE OXIDATIONS. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)74822-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.