The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A SIMPLE AND ACCURATE METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF CHLORIDE IN BIOLOGICAL FLUIDS
Open accessAbstract
Several modifications of the classical Volhard method (1) for the determination of chloride have been proposed but none is entirely free from the drawbacks of the original procedure. One of the principal causes of error is that the end-point fades and is uncertain when the silver chloride precipitate is not removed before titration. This is due to the fact that AgCl is more soluble than AgSCN and therefore reacts with thiocyanate: AgCl + SCN’ = AgSCN + Cl’. In order to avoid this reaction and to make an accurate determination possible, AgCl has to be filtered off. This, however, introduces a new error, as, according to Kolthoff (2), a definite loss in silver ions occurs through adsorption on the precipitate. The possibility of retarding the reaction with the precipitate so that the end-point lasts long enough to afford an accurate result was studied by a number of authors, some of them being quoted by Peters and Van Slyke (3). While a satisfactory modification of Volhard’s method without removal of the silver chloride has not yet been published, efforts to replace his procedure by methods based on different principles have led to promising results. A number of those newer methods have been investigated and, while many of them give reliable results, only a few are at the same time simple enough to compete with the traditional Volhard procedure and its modifications. Consequently it has been concluded that the mercurimetric determination of chloride offers an especially favorable method for a rapid, simple, and accurate determination.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cationic lipids and surfactants as antifungal agents:mode of action
Vieira, D. B. (2006) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dkl312 · Cited by 233
Hammond, K. B., Turcios, N. L., & Gibson, L. E. (1994) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/s0022-3476(94)70314-0 · Cited by 178
THE SWEAT TEST IN CYSTIC FIBROSIS
Shwachman, H., & Antonowicz, I. (1962) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1962.tb30495.x · Cited by 51
Interactions between Cationic Vesicles and Candida albicans
Campanhã, M. T. N., Mamizuka, E. M., & Carmona-Ribeiro, A. M. (2001) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp003315+ · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Schales, O., & Schales, S. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1941-09
- Volume
- 140
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 879-884
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1551849342
- Cited by
- 1,129
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A SIMPLE AND ACCURATE METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF CHLORIDE IN BIOLOGICAL FLUIDS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)72872-x
- The paper
- Schales, O., & Schales, S. S. (1941). A SIMPLE AND ACCURATE METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF CHLORIDE IN BIOLOGICAL FLUIDS. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)72872-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.