The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Identification of residues critical for the polymerase activity of the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I from Escherichia coli.
Open accessAbstract
The Klenow fragment structure, together with many biochemical experiments, has suggested a region of the protein that may contain the polymerase active site. We have changed 7 amino acid residues within this region by site-directed mutagenesis, yielding 12 mutant proteins which have been purified and analyzed in vitro. The results of steady-state kinetic determinations of Km(dNTP) and kcat for the polymerase reaction, together with measurements of DNA binding affinity, suggest strongly that this study has succeeded in targeting important active site residues. Moreover, the in vitro data allow dissection of the proposed active site region into two clusters of residues that are spatially, as well as functionally, fairly distinct. Mutations in Tyr766, Arg841, and Asn845 cause an increase in Km(dNTP), suggesting that contacts with the incoming dNTP are made in this region. Mutations in the second cluster of residues, Gln849, Arg668, and Asp882, cause a large decrease in kcat, suggesting a role for these residues in catalysis of the polymerase reaction. The DNA-binding properties of mutations at positions 849 and 668 may indicate that the catalytic role of these side chains is associated with their interaction with the DNA substrate. Screening of the mutations in vivo for the classical polA-defective phenotype (sensitivity to DNA damage) demonstrated that a genetic screen of this type may be a reasonable predictor or kcat or of DNA binding affinity in future mutational studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Crystal structure at 3.5 A resolution of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase complexed with an inhibitor
Kohlstaedt, L. A., Wang, J., Friedman, J. M., Rice, P. A., & Steitz, T. A. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1377403 · Cited by 1,914
Self-citationKunkel, T. A., & Bebenek, K. (2000) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.69.1.497 · Cited by 1,003
Visualizing DNA replication in a catalytically active Bacillus DNA polymerase crystal
Kiefer, J. R., Mao, C., Braman, J. C., & Beese, L. S. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/34693 · Cited by 517
Structure of DNA Polymerase I Klenow Fragment Bound to Duplex DNA
Beese, L. S., Derbyshire, V., & Steitz, T. A. (1993) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8469987 · Cited by 474
Self-citationDNA Polymerase γ, The Mitochondrial Replicase
Kaguni, L. S. (2004) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.72.121801.161455 · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Authors
- Polesky, A. H., Steitz, T. A., Grindley, N. D., & Joyce, C. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1990-08
- Volume
- 265
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 14579-14591
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1595027863
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of residues critical for the polymerase activity of the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I from Escherichia coli. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)77342-0
- The paper
- Polesky, A. H., Steitz, T. A., Grindley, N. D., & Joyce, C. M. (1990). Identification of residues critical for the polymerase activity of the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I from Escherichia coli. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)77342-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.