The DOI matches its Crossref record.
AQUEOUS EXTRACTS OF PANCREAS
Open accessAbstract
Rapid preparation of insulin for medicinal purposes requires that a means be found of removing it from solution by some method more expeditious than that of drying. The previous study was convincing regarding the necessary conditions for rapid extraction. Avoidance of expense obviously favors an aqueous method, but the task of effecting the necessary concentration for use in human cases even by vacuum distillation is time-consuming. The present study was undertaken with a double purpose: (1) to find an inexpensive method of concentration and (2) to take the preliminary steps toward isolation of the pure substance. It was begun in October, 1922, and has been pursued as opportunity afforded the use of potent preparations not required for more urgent purposes. The results here presented should be regarded as preliminary, but will be found, we think, both reliable and consistent. They have led to the development of the improved method of preparation to be described in a subsequent paper. The preparations used were the purest available by the methods in use up to April of this year. For the most part these methods varied little from that described in the previous paper (Paper II of this series). All these preparations gave the biuret reaction varying from feeble to vivid, and it is quite possible that the precipitation recorded in many instances is in part a reaction with protein as well &s with the insulin itself. Nevertheless, the protein was the least in amount we were able to attain and can scarcely have been the only source of the precipitate, for many of the reagents which failed are well known protein
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1)
Müller, T. D., Finan, B., Bloom, S. R., D'Alessio, D., Drucker, D. J., Flatt, P. R., Fritsche, A., Gribble, F., Grill, H. J., Habener, J. F., et al. (2019) · Molecular Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.molmet.2019.09.010 · Cited by 1,868
Glucagonocentric restructuring of diabetes: A pathophysiologic and therapeutic makeover
Unger, R. H., & Cherrington, A. D. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci60016 · Cited by 670
Advance in peptide-based drug development: delivery platforms, therapeutics and vaccines
Xiao, W., Jiang, W., Chen, Z., Huang, Y., Mao, J., Zheng, W., Hu, Y., & Shi, J. (2025) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-024-02107-5 · Cited by 449
The New Biology and Pharmacology of Glucagon
Müller, T. D., Finan, B., Clemmensen, C., DiMarchi, R. D., & Tschöp, M. H. (2017) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00025.2016 · Cited by 419
Wasserman, D. H. (2009) · American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.1152/ajpendo.90563.2008 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Kimball, C. P., & Murlin, J. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1923-11
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 337-346
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1569090915
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor, 35425 d)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: AQUEOUS EXTRACTS OF PANCREAS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)85474-6
- The paper
- Kimball, C. P., & Murlin, J. R. (1923). AQUEOUS EXTRACTS OF PANCREAS. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)85474-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.