Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 179

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stacking energies in DNA

Open access
Delcourt, S.G., Blake, R.D.·1991·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Variations in base mono- and dipoles result in variations in stacking energies for the 10 unique neighbor pairs in DNA. Stacking energies for pair M on N, expressed as TMN, were derived by matrix decomposition of a large set of linear algebraic expressions relating the measured Tm for subtransitions emanating from large polymeric DNAs, and the fractional neighbor frequencies, fMN, for the domains responsible for the transitions, Tm = sigma fMNTMN. Tm were determined for subtransitions that dissociate in approximately all-or-none fashion in high resolution melting profiles of partially deleted and recombinant forms of pBR322 DNA. Three different analytical maneuvers were undertaken to resolve subtransitions: site-specific cleavage of domains; deletion of domains; and addition of domains. Three dozen domains of widely divergent, quasi-random neighbor frequencies were identified and assigned, resulting in a unique set of values for TMN with standard deviation, sigma = +/- 0.23 degree C. The average difference between calculated and experimental Tm for domains is only +/- 0.17 degree C, indicating that the thermodynamic properties of these domains are not in any way unusual. Assuming delta S to be constant for all pairs, the corresponding delta HMN are found to have a precision of +/- 10 calories.mol-1 and an accuracy of +/- 606 calories.mol-1. TMN used to calculate melting curves by statistical mechanical analysis of sequences of the different plasmid specimens in this study were in quantitative agreement with observed curves for most sequences. These TMN differ significantly from those determined previously and also correlate poorly with values determined by quantum chemical analysis. Stabilities of neighbor pairs, expressed as the difference in free energy between that for a given pair (MN) and that for the average of like pairs (M, N), depend on the relationship of stacked purines and pyrimidines as follows. delta delta Gpu-py(-466 cal) greater than delta delta Gpu-pu(+52 cal) greater than delta delta Gpy-pu(+335 cal) Differences between experimental Tm and Tm calculated with TMN for the isolated neighbor pairs in the B-conformation are useful in the identification of altered structures and unusual modes of dissociation of helixes. A significantly higher Tm is observed for the highly biased repeated sequence synthetic helixes dA.dT, d(AGC).d(GCT), and d(GAT).d(ATC), reflecting auxiliary sources of stability such as bifurcated hydrogen bonds and/or altered structures for these helixes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)98599-6

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 179

Metadata

Authors
Delcourt, S. G., & Blake, R. D.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1991-08
Volume
266
Issue
23
Pages
15160-15169
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1512397531
Cited by
179
References
2
FWCI
2.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stacking energies in DNA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)98599-6
The paper
Delcourt, S. G., & Blake, R. D. (1991). Stacking energies in DNA. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)98599-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.