The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Binding Site for Sulfate and Its Relation to Sulfate Transport into Salmonella typhimurium
Open accessAbstract
Mutants of Salmonella typhimurium classified by nutritional and enzymatic tests as transport-negative for sulfate are capable of combining with small amounts of this anion (up to 104 molecules per bacterium). The following results support the suggestion that the bacteria possess highly specific sulfate binding sites near the cell surface. 1. Under growth conditions sulfate combines with the bacteria according to a typical adsorption isotherm, which reaches half-saturation at 0.004 mm. 2. Various anions structurally similar to sulfate are specific inhibitors of binding and transport. 3. Inability of the mutants to grow on sulfate or thiosulfate suggests that the anions cannot enter the cells, but are bound near the cell surface. 4. The cells lose their ability to bind sulfate after they are converted to spheroplasts or are osmotically shocked. With the use of a new assay for the measurement of binding to soluble entities, the binding ability lost from the cells is found in solution. 5. The properties of the binding system suggest that it might be a part of the active transport system for sulfate. The surface location of the binding material as well as the following results are consistent with this hypothesis. Both binding activity and active transport are repressed by the growth of bacteria on cysteine as a sulfur source. Both functions are similarly (but not identically) inhibited by various anions. Both functions are lost, in proportion, upon osmotic shock of transport-positive cells. Both functions are simultaneously lost in a class of chromate-resistant mutants, and are regained upon transduction with PLT-22 phage or reversion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Purification and Properties of an Adenosine Triphosphatase from Sarcoplasmic Reticulum
MacLennan, D. H. (1970) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(19)63820-2 · Cited by 833
Toxic and genotoxic effects of hexavalent chromium in environment and its bioremediation strategies
Mishra, S., & Bharagava, R. N. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part C · doi:10.1080/10590501.2015.1096883 · Cited by 513
Carrier-mediated Transport of the Folic Acid Analogue, Methotrexate, in the L1210 Leukemia Cell
Goldman, I. D., Lichtenstein, N. S., & Oliverio, V. T. (1968) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)91984-8 · Cited by 372
Transformation of selenate and selenite to elemental selenium byDesulfovibrio desulfuricans
Tomei, F. A., Barton, L. L., Lemanski, C. L., Zocco, T. G., Fink, N. H., & Sillerud, L. O. (1995) · Journal of Industrial Microbiology · doi:10.1007/bf01569947 · Cited by 148
Metadata
- Authors
- Pardee, A. B., Prestidge, L. S., Whipple, M. B., & Dreyfuss, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1966-09
- Volume
- 241
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 3962-3969
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1562682267
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Binding Site for Sulfate and Its Relation to Sulfate Transport into Salmonella typhimurium. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)99799-1
- The paper
- Pardee, A. B., Prestidge, L. S., Whipple, M. B., & Dreyfuss, J. (1966). A Binding Site for Sulfate and Its Relation to Sulfate Transport into Salmonella typhimurium. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)99799-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.