Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 173

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Binding Site for Sulfate and Its Relation to Sulfate Transport into Salmonella typhimurium

Open access
Pardee, Arthur B., Prestidge, Louise S., Whipple, Mettie B., Dreyfuss, Jacques·1966·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Mutants of Salmonella typhimurium classified by nutritional and enzymatic tests as transport-negative for sulfate are capable of combining with small amounts of this anion (up to 104 molecules per bacterium). The following results support the suggestion that the bacteria possess highly specific sulfate binding sites near the cell surface. 1. Under growth conditions sulfate combines with the bacteria according to a typical adsorption isotherm, which reaches half-saturation at 0.004 mm. 2. Various anions structurally similar to sulfate are specific inhibitors of binding and transport. 3. Inability of the mutants to grow on sulfate or thiosulfate suggests that the anions cannot enter the cells, but are bound near the cell surface. 4. The cells lose their ability to bind sulfate after they are converted to spheroplasts or are osmotically shocked. With the use of a new assay for the measurement of binding to soluble entities, the binding ability lost from the cells is found in solution. 5. The properties of the binding system suggest that it might be a part of the active transport system for sulfate. The surface location of the binding material as well as the following results are consistent with this hypothesis. Both binding activity and active transport are repressed by the growth of bacteria on cysteine as a sulfur source. Both functions are similarly (but not identically) inhibited by various anions. Both functions are lost, in proportion, upon osmotic shock of transport-positive cells. Both functions are simultaneously lost in a class of chromate-resistant mutants, and are regained upon transduction with PLT-22 phage or reversion.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)99799-1

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 173

Metadata

Authors
Pardee, A. B., Prestidge, L. S., Whipple, M. B., & Dreyfuss, J.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1966-09
Volume
241
Issue
17
Pages
3962-3969
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1562682267
Cited by
173
References
0
FWCI
13.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Binding Site for Sulfate and Its Relation to Sulfate Transport into Salmonella typhimurium. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)99799-1
The paper
Pardee, A. B., Prestidge, L. S., Whipple, M. B., & Dreyfuss, J. (1966). A Binding Site for Sulfate and Its Relation to Sulfate Transport into Salmonella typhimurium. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)99799-1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.