Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 336

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Histones of Drosophila Embryos

Open access
Alfageme, Candido Rodriguez, Zweidler, Alfred, Mahowald, Anthony, Cohen, Leonard H.·1974·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Five main classes of histones and one minor component have been isolated from Drosophila melanogaster embryos and purified by means of a gel electrophoretic method in which the electrophoretic mobilities of proteins depend on their hydrophobicity in addition to their charge and mass. When the purified histones are compared with analogous vertebrate histones in amino acid composition, the extent of difference varies widely among the different histone classes, the order from most to least conserved being F2a1, F3, F2a2, F2b, and F1. The compositional differences between mammalian and Drosophila F1 histones are particularly large, exceeding 30% for all amino acids except lysine and arginine. The F1 histone of Drosophila was cleaved with CNBr, and the COOH-terminal peptide, representing 60% of the molecule, was isolated. It was found to be enriched in lysine, as in rabbit F1 histone. These results suggest that despite the high rate of evolutionary change of this histone, the general arrangement of positively charged residues is largely conserved, possibly to satisfy requirements for correct binding to DNA. However, this COOH-terminal peptide contains less than one-half of the number of prolyl residues present in the corresponding portion of rabbit F1, indicating that the lysine-, alanine-, and proline-rich portion of this region, believed to be very constant among mammalian F1 histones, can undergo striking evolutionary changes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(19)42534-9

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 336

Metadata

Authors
Alfageme, C. R., Zweidler, A., Mahowald, A., & Cohen, L. H.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1974-06
Volume
249
Issue
12
Pages
3729-3736
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1505269918
Cited by
336
References
0
FWCI
6.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Histones of Drosophila Embryos. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(19)42534-9
The paper
Alfageme, C. R., Zweidler, A., Mahowald, A., & Cohen, L. H. (1974). Histones of Drosophila Embryos. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(19)42534-9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.