Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 331

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Basic and acidic fibroblast growth factors interact with the same cell surface receptors.

Open access
Neufeld, G, Gospodarowicz, D·1986·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Despite quantitative differences, the activity of basic and acidic fibroblast growth factors (FGF) on a wide variety of normal diploid cells derived from neuroectoderm and mesoderm is intrinsically similar. This suggests that they bind to the same cell surface receptors. This was investigated using a baby hamster kidney cell line (BHK-21) as a model. BHK-21 cell membrane components that interact with basic and acidic FGF have been identified by covalent cross-linking to their respective 125I-labeled ligands. Under appropriate conditions, basic and acidic 125I-FGF were cross-linked, using disuccinimidyl suberate, to two receptor species with apparent molecular masses of 145,000 and 125,000 daltons, respectively. The labeling of those receptors is inhibited when either native basic or acidic FGF are present in excess during incubation of cells with either acidic or basic 125I-FGF. Competition of basic 125I-FGF with increasing concentrations of native acidic FGF results in a preferential decrease in the labeling of the 125,000-dalton species, whereas competition of acidic 125I-FGF with increasing concentrations of native basic FGF leads to a preferential decrease in the labeling of the 145,000-dalton species. The data suggest that qualitatively both mitogens interact with the same 145,000- and 125,000-dalton receptor species. The different affinities displayed by acidic and basic FGF toward their common receptor molecules could explain why acidic FGF, depending on the cell type considered, is 20-100-fold less potent than basic FGF.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(19)57261-1

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Neufeld, G., & Gospodarowicz, D.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1986-04
Volume
261
Issue
12
Pages
5631-5637
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1498607624
Cited by
331
References
0
FWCI
17.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.