Cited by 269Protease and Inhibitor MechanismsRedox biology and oxidative stressNeutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms

Oxidation of either Methionine 351 or Methionine 358 in α1-Antitrypsin Causes Loss of Anti-neutrophil Elastase Activity

Open access
Taggart, Clifford, Cervantes-Laurean, Daniel, Kim, Geumsoo, McElvaney, Noel G., Wehr, Nancy, Moss, Joel, Levine, Rodney L.·2000·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Hydrogen peroxide is a component of cigarette smoke known to be essential for inactivation of α 1 -antitrypsin, the primary inhibitor of neutrophil elastase. To establish the molecular basis of the inactivation of α 1 -antitrypsin, we determined the sites oxidized by hydrogen peroxide. Two of the nine methionines were particularly susceptible to oxidation. One was methionine 358, whose oxidation was known to cause loss of anti-elastase activity. The other, methionine 351, was as susceptible to oxidation as methionine 358. Its oxidation also resulted in loss of anti-elastase activity, an effect not previously recognized. The equal susceptibility of methionine 358 and methionine 351 to oxidation was confirmed by mass spectrometry. To verify this finding, we produced recombinant α 1 -antitrypsins in which one or both of the susceptible methionines were mutated to valine. M351V and M358V were not as rapidly inactivated as wild-type α1-antitrypsin, but only the double mutant M351V/M358V was markedly resistant to oxidative inactivation. We suggest that inactivation of α 1 -antitrypsin by oxidation of either methionine 351 or 358 provides a mechanism for regulation of its activity at sites of inflammation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(19)61505-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A1AT potency is entirely abrogated under oxidative conditions due to oxidation of a methionine residue in the P1 position of its protease binding surface.

    “However, the potency of A1AT inhibition is entirely abrogated under oxidative conditions, such as those induced by a neutrophil response to infection, due to the oxidation of a methionine residue in the P1 position (Schechter–Berger nomenclature [13]) of its protease binding surface [14,15].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Taggart, C., Cervantes-Laurean, D., Kim, G., McElvaney, N. G., Wehr, N., Moss, J., & Levine, R. L.
Affiliations
  • Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (IE)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Levine, Rodney L.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-09
Volume
275
Issue
35
Pages
27258-27265
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4243348004
Cited by
269
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Redox biology and oxidative stress
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms
Keywords
alpha-1-antitrypsin, methionine oxidation, hydrogen peroxide, oxidative inactivation, neutrophil elastase inhibition, cigarette smoke, double mutants, inflammation, protease inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review