Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 538

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Interaction of γ-Glutamyl Transpeptidase with Amino Acids, Dipeptides, and Derivatives and Analogs of Glutathione

Open access
Tate, Suresh S., Meister, Alton·1974·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Abstract A highly purified and apparently homogeneous preparation of rat kidney γ-glutamyl transpeptidase was examined with respect to its γ-glutamyl donor and acceptor specificities. Many γ-glutamyl amino acids were active as γ-glutamyl donors, the most active being l-γ-glutamyl-l-glutamine and l-γglutamyl-l-methionine. Glutathione disulfide was about 5% as active as glutathione, while substantial activity was found with S-methylglutathione and ophthalmic acid. In the course of this work convenient spectrophotometric methods for the determination of γ-glutamyl transpeptidase activity were developed in which S-substituted derivatives of glutathione were used, e.g. the S-propanone and S-acetophenone derivatives; these procedures are based on the high ultraviolet absorbance of the corresponding S-substituted products. Several of the S-substituted glutathiones were more active in transpeptidation than glutathione itself. Kinetic studies were carried out which indicate a ping-pong mechanism consistent with intermediate formation of a γglutamyl enzyme. Of the 32 amino acids tested, l-glutamine and l-methionine were the best acceptors of the γ-glutamyl group. A number of dipeptides were active as acceptors, and several of these were more active than l-glutamine, e.g. glycylglycine, glycyl-l-alanine, l-methionyl-l-serine, lglutaminyl-l-glutamine, and l-α-aminobutyrylglycine. Aminoacylglycine derivatives were (in the five instances studied) more active than the corresponding free NH2-terminal amino acids; the corresponding aminoacyl-l-alanine derivatives were less active than the aminoacylglycines. The high reactivity of certain dipeptides may reflect their affinity for the cysteinylglycine site of the enzyme, but the findings are also consistent with a function of γ-glutamyl transpeptidase in peptide transport as well as in amino acid transport. γGlutamyl transpeptidase is inhibited substantially by the γglutamyl hydrazones of a number of α-keto acids. Inhibition is competitive with respect to the γ-glutamyl donor; of seven α-keto acid γ-glutamyl hydrazones, the derivative of α-ketoglutarate inhibited the most.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(19)81279-6

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 60

  1. Tate, 1974, Fed. Proc., 33, 1379
  2. Meister, 1973, Science, 180, 33, 10.1126/science.180.4081.33 · DOI · Paper page
  3. OrłOwski, 1970, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 67, 1248, 10.1073/pnas.67.3.1248 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Van Der Werf, 1971, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 68, 2982, 10.1073/pnas.68.12.2982 · DOI
  5. Albert, 1961, Nature, 191, 767, 10.1038/191767a0 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Glenner, 1961, Nature, 192, 338, 10.1038/192338a0 · doi:10.1038/192338a0
  7. Glenner, 1962, J. Histochem. Cytochem., 10, 481, 10.1177/10.4.481 · DOI
  8. Glossman, 1972, Fed. Eur. Biochem. Soc. Lett., 19, 340, 10.1016/0014-5793(72)80075-9 · doi:10.1016/0014-5793(72)80075-9
  9. George, 1973, Biochem. J., 134, 43, 10.1042/bj1340043 · doi:10.1042/bj1340043
  10. Albert, 1964, Acta Histochem., 18, 78
  11. Albert, 1966, Acta Histochem., 25, 312
  12. Hanker, 1966, Science, 152, 1631, 10.1126/science.152.3729.1631 · DOI
  13. Greenberg, 1967, Clin. Chim. Acta, 16, 79, 10.1016/0009-8981(67)90272-0 · doi:10.1016/0009-8981(67)90272-0
  14. Rutenburg, 1969, J. Histochem. Cytochem., 17, 517, 10.1177/17.8.517 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Albert, 1970, Acta Histochem., 37, 74
  16. Seligman, 1970, J. Histochem. Cytochem., 18, 542, 10.1177/18.8.542 · doi:10.1177/18.8.542
  17. Tate, 1973, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 70, 1447, 10.1073/pnas.70.5.1447 · DOI
  18. Ross, 1973, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 70, 2211, 10.1073/pnas.70.8.2211 · doi:10.1073/pnas.70.8.2211
  19. Meister, 1974, Life Sci., 15, 177, 10.1016/0024-3205(74)90206-9 · DOI
  20. Hanes, 1950, Nature, 166, 288, 10.1038/166288a0 · doi:10.1038/166288a0
  21. Hanes, 1952, Biochem. J., 51, 25, 10.1042/bj0510025 · doi:10.1042/bj0510025
  22. Fodor, 1953, J. Biol. Chem., 202, 551, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)66169-1 · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)66169-1
  23. Fodor, 1953, J. Biol. Chem., 203, 991, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)52369-9 · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(19)52369-9
  24. Kinoshita, 1953, J. Biol. Chem., 200, 609, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)71406-3 · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)71406-3
  25. Hird, 1954, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 15, 31, 10.1016/0006-3002(54)90090-6 · doi:10.1016/0006-3002(54)90090-6
  26. Hird, 1954, Biochem. J., 56, 417, 10.1042/bj0560417 · doi:10.1042/bj0560417
  27. Revel, 1959, J. Biol. Chem., 234, 577, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)70248-2 · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)70248-2
  28. Goldbarg, 1960, Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 91, 61, 10.1016/0003-9861(60)90455-0 · doi:10.1016/0003-9861(60)90455-0
  29. Binkley, 1961, J. Biol. Chem., 236, 1075, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)64244-9 · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)64244-9
  30. Szewczuk, 1963, Biochem. Z., 338, 317
  31. OrłOwski, 1965, J. Biol. Chem., 240, 338, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)97654-4 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Leibach, 1968, Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 127, 292, 10.1016/0003-9861(68)90229-4 · doi:10.1016/0003-9861(68)90229-4
  33. Richter, 1969, Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp., 17, 476
  34. Sheehan, 1950, J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 72, 2469, 10.1021/ja01162a031 · doi:10.1021/ja01162a031
  35. King, 1957, J. Chem. Soc., 886, 10.1039/JR9570000886 · doi:10.1039/jr9570000886
  36. King, 1949, J. Chem. Soc., 3315, 10.1039/JR9490003315 · DOI
  37. Strumeyer, 1962, Biochem. Prep., 9, 52
  38. Cooper, 1973, J. Biol. Chem., 248, 8489, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)43159-1 · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(19)43159-1
  39. Pfister, 1970, Chem. Abstr., 72, 429
  40. Avi-Dor, 1960, Biochem. J., 75, 370, 10.1042/bj0760370 · doi:10.1042/bj0760370
  41. OrłOwski, 1963, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 73, 679, 10.1016/0926-6569(63)90197-4 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Lowry, 1951, J. Biol. Chem., 193, 265, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)52451-6 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Ball, 1966, Biochem. Pharmacol., 15, 809, 10.1016/0006-2952(66)90157-2 · DOI
  44. Avi-Dor, 1956, J. Biol. Chem., 222, 249, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)50790-6 · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(19)50790-6
  45. Cleland, 1963, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 67, 104, 10.1016/0926-6569(63)90211-6 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Meister, 1968, Advan. Enzymol., 31, 183
  47. Gass, 1970, Biochemistry, 9, 1380, 10.1021/bi00808a012 · DOI
  48. Binkley, 1951, Nature, 167, 888, 10.1038/167888a0 · DOI
  49. Ball, 1953, Biol. Bull., 105, 369
  50. OrłOwski, 1961, Acta Biochim. Pol., 8, 189
  51. OrłOwski, 1963, Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp., 11, 1
  52. Kokot, 1965, Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp., 13, 549
  53. OrłOwski, 1969, Biochemistry, 8, 1048, 10.1021/bi00831a036 · doi:10.1021/bi00831a036
  54. Young, 1971, Clin. Chem., 17, 245, 10.1093/clinchem/17.4.245 · doi:10.1093/clinchem/17.4.245
  55. OrłOwski, 1973, J. Biol. Chem., 248, 2836, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)44083-0 · DOI
  56. Maack, 1974, Fed. Proc., 33, 305
  57. Milne, 1971, Sci. Basis Med. Annu. Rev., 161
  58. Das, 1973, Biochem. J., 135, 609, 10.1042/bj1350609 · doi:10.1042/bj1350609
  59. Ivanov, 1969, Advan. Enzymol., 32, 21
  60. Boyland, 1969, Advan. Enzymol., 32, 173

Cited by

See all 538

Metadata

Authors
Tate, S. S., & Meister, A.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1974-12
Volume
249
Issue
23
Pages
7593-7602
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1648994921
Cited by
538
References
0
FWCI
14.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interaction of γ-Glutamyl Transpeptidase with Amino Acids, Dipeptides, and Derivatives and Analogs of Glutathione. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(19)81279-6
The paper
Tate, S. S., & Meister, A. (1974). Interaction of γ-Glutamyl Transpeptidase with Amino Acids, Dipeptides, and Derivatives and Analogs of Glutathione. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(19)81279-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.