Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 475

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A macrophage receptor that recognizes oxidized low density lipoprotein but not acetylated low density lipoprotein

Open access
Sparrow, C P, Parthasarathy, S, Steinberg, D·1989·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

The formation of cholesterol-loaded macrophage foam cells in arterial tissue may occur by the uptake of modified lipoproteins via the scavenger receptor pathway. The macrophage scavenger receptor, also called the acetylated low density lipoprotein (Ac-LDL) receptor, has been reported to recognize Ac-LDL as well as oxidized LDL species such as endothelial cell-modified LDL (EC-LDL). We now report that there is another class of macrophage receptors that recognizes EC-LDL but not Ac-LDL. We performed assays of 0 degrees C binding and 37 degrees C degradation of 125I-Ac-LDL and 125I-EC-LDL by mouse peritoneal macrophages. Competition studies showed that unlabeled Ac-LDL could compete for only 25% of the binding and only 50% of the degradation of 125I-EC-LDL. Unlabeled EC-LDL, however, competed for greater than 90% of 125I-EC-LDL binding and degradation. Unlabeled Ac-LDL was greater than 90% effective against 125I-Ac-LDL; EC-LDL competed for about 80% of 125I-Ac-LDL binding and degradation. Copper-oxidized LDL behaved the same as EC-LDL in all the competition studies. Copper-mediated oxidation of Ac-LDL produced a superior competitor which could now displace 90% of 125I-EC-LDL binding. After 5 h at 37 degrees C in the presence of ligand, macrophages accumulated six times more cell-associated radioactivity from 125I-EC-LDL than from 125I-Ac-LDL, despite approximately equal amounts of degradation to trichloroacetic acid-soluble products, which may imply different intracellular processing of the two lipoproteins. Our results suggest that 1) there is more than one macrophage "scavenger receptor" for modified lipoproteins; and 2) oxidized LDL and Ac-LDL are not identical ligands with respect to macrophage recognition and uptake.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(19)81655-1

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Sparrow, C. P., Parthasarathy, S., & Steinberg, D.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1989-02
Volume
264
Issue
5
Pages
2599-2604
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1484860178
Cited by
475
References
0
FWCI
66.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A macrophage receptor that recognizes oxidized low density lipoprotein but not acetylated low density lipoprotein. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(19)81655-1
The paper
Sparrow, C. P., Parthasarathy, S., & Steinberg, D. (1989). A macrophage receptor that recognizes oxidized low density lipoprotein but not acetylated low density lipoprotein. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(19)81655-1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.