The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Species correlations between cardiac isomyosins. A comparison of electrophoretic and immunological properties.
Open accessAbstract
Structural relationships between cardiac isomyosins were analyzed in 10 species using native-gel electrophoresis and radioimmunoassay. In the rat and rabbit, three types of ventricular isomyosin, V1, V2, and V3, were identified by electrophoresis. Monoclonal antibodies specific for the heavy chains of either type V1 or type V3 isomyosin in the rat and rabbit were used for comparison of immunological relationships between atrial and ventricular myosins in other species. Normal guinea pig ventricular myosin reacted with both anti-V2 and anti-V3 antibodies, but only a single myosin band was detected in this species by electrophoresis. When thyrotoxic cardiac hypertrophy was induced in guinea pigs, there was a decrease in myosin reactivity with the anti-V3 antibody and an increase in anti-V1 reactivity. This change in immunological reactivity indicated a change in proportions of two cardiac isomyosins in the guinea pig ventricle even though no myosin heterogeneity was detected by electrophoresis. In six other species including Xenopus, chicken, dog, pig, beef, and human, only a single band of myosin was detected by electrophoresis, and each myosin reacted only with the anti-V3 antibody. In the mouse, three types of ventricular myosin were also detected by electrophoresis. However, unlike V1 isomyosin of the rat and rabbit, mouse V1 isomyosin reacted equally with both anti-V1 and anti-V3 antibodies. In conclusion, we have identified highly conserved epitopes in cardiac myosin, which were found to specifically occur on either the high Ca2+-ATPase type V1 isomyosin or the lower ATPase type V3 ventricular isomyosin in most of the species examined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lowes, B. D., Minobe, W., Abraham, W. T., Rizeq, M. N., Bohlmeyer, T. J., Quaife, R. A., Roden, R. L., Dutcher, D. L., Robertson, A. D., Voelkel, N. F., et al. (1997) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci119770 · Cited by 503
Zhao, L., & Zhang, B. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep44735 · Cited by 375
Fuller, G. A., Bicer, S., Hamlin, R. L., Yamaguchi, M., & Reiser, P. J. (2007) · Journal of Cardiac Failure · doi:10.1016/j.cardfail.2007.05.006 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Clark, W. A., Chizzonite, R. A., Everett, A. W., Rabinowitz, M., & Zak, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1982-05
- Volume
- 257
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 5449-5454
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1481753986
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Species correlations between cardiac isomyosins. A comparison of electrophoretic and immunological properties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(19)83798-5
- The paper
- Clark, W. A., Chizzonite, R. A., Everett, A. W., Rabinowitz, M., & Zak, R. (1982). Species correlations between cardiac isomyosins. A comparison of electrophoretic and immunological properties. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(19)83798-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.