Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 587

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Involvement of Human Placental Microsomal Cytochrome P-450 in Aromatization

Open access
Thompson, E. Aubrey, Siiteri, Pentti K.·1974·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

The aromatization of androstenedione is inhibited in the presence of aminoglutethimide, diethylaminoethyl-2,2-diphenyl valerate HCl (SKF 525-A), and 10-3m KCN, but not carbon monoxide or metyrapone. The role of cytochrome P-450 in this reaction could not, therefore, be unequivocally established by inhibition studies. However, it was determined that steroid binding to placental microsomal cytochrome P-450 is absolutely specific for aromatase substrates, intermediates, and inhibitors. Moreover, the substrate 19-nortestosterone, aromatization of which is inhibited by CO, is a competitive inhibitor of both the aromatization and cytochrome P-450 binding of androstenedione, and vice versa. These results suggest that a single species of cytochrome P-450 is responsible for the aromatization of both steroids. Furthermore, both 19-hydroxyandrostenedione and 19-oxoandrostenedione also compete with androstenedione and 19-nortestosterone for the same species of cytochrome P-450. This suggests that all three hydroxylation reactions of C19 aromatization as well as the aromatization of 19-nortestosterone are carried out at the same enzyme site. In addition, an antibody raised against porcine hepatic NADPH-cytochome c reductase, which specifically inhibits cytochrome P-450 mediated reactions, is a potent inhibitor of the aromatization of both C19 and C18 estrogen precursors. The extent of inhibition of the CO-sensitive aromatization of C18 substrates by the antibody is similar to that observed for CO-sensitive drug hydroxylations occurring in liver microsomes. On the other hand, inhibition of the aromatization of the non-CO-sensitive substrate, androstenedione, by the antibody was atypical in that a much greater inhibitory effect on aromatization than on cytochrome c reduction was found. The distinct patterns of inhibition of aromatization by the reductase antibody are consistent with the hypothesis that the rate of entry of the first electron into the oxidized P-450 substrate complex may be rate limiting in the aromatization of C19 but not C18 steroids. The difference in the rate of entry of the first electron would be reflected in the extent to which the reduced P-450 substrate complex accumulates during the steady state. Since CO inhibition occurs at the level of the reduced P-450 substrate complex, variation in the steady state concentration of this intermediate could explain the difference in CO sensitivity observed between C19 and C18 substrates.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(20)79736-x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 587

Metadata

Authors
Thompson, E. A., & Siiteri, P. K.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1974-09
Volume
249
Issue
17
Pages
5373-5378
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1601438131
Cited by
587
References
1
FWCI
8.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Involvement of Human Placental Microsomal Cytochrome P-450 in Aromatization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(20)79736-x
The paper
Thompson, E. A., & Siiteri, P. K. (1974). The Involvement of Human Placental Microsomal Cytochrome P-450 in Aromatization. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(20)79736-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.