The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Experimental verification and theoretical prediction of cartilage interstitial fluid pressurization at an impermeable contact interface in confined compression
Open accessAbstract
Interstitial fluid pressurization has long been hypothesized to play a fundamental role in the load support mechanism and frictional response of articular cartilage. However, to date, few experimental studies have been performed to verify this hypothesis from direct measurements. The first objective of this study was to investigate experimentally the hypothesis that cartilage interstitial fluid pressurization does support the great majority of the applied load, in the testing configurations of confined compression creep and stress relaxation. The second objective was to investigate the hypothesis that the experimentally observed interstitial fluid pressurization could also be predicted using the linear biphasic theory of Mow et al. (J. Biomech. Engng ASME, 102, 73-84, 1980). Fourteen bovine cartilage samples were tested in a confined compression chamber fitted with a microchip piezoresistive transducer to measure interstitial fluid pressure, while simultaneously measuring (during stress relaxation) or prescribing (during creep) the total stress. It was found that interstitial fluid pressure supported more than 90% of the total stress for durations as long as 725 +/- 248 s during stress relaxation (mean +/- S.D., n = 7), and 404 +/- 229 s during creep (n = 7). When comparing experimental measurements of the time-varying interstitial fluid pressure against predictions from the linear biphasic theory, nonlinear coefficients of determination r2 = 0.871 +/- 0.086 (stress relaxation) and r2 = 0.941 +/- 0.061 (creep) were found. The results of this study provide some of the most direct evidence to date that interstitial fluid pressurization plays a fundamental role in cartilage mechanics; they also indicate that the mechanism of fluid load support in cartilage can be properly predicted from theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Modelling cartilage mechanobiology
Carter, D. R., & Wong, M. (2003) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2003.1346 · Cited by 177
Microscale frictional response of bovine articular cartilage from atomic force microscopy
Park, S., Costa, K. D., & Ateshian, G. A. (2004) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.017 · Cited by 139
Self-citationComparison of natural crosslinking agents for the stabilization of xenogenic articular cartilage
Pinheiro, A., Cooley, A., Liao, J., Prabhu, R., & Elder, S. (2016) · Journal of Orthopaedic Research · doi:10.1002/jor.23121 · Cited by 81
Computational aspects in mechanical modeling of the articular cartilage tissue
Mohammadi, H., Mequanint, K., & Herzog, W. (2013) · Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine · doi:10.1177/0954411912470239 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Soltz, M. A., & Ateshian, G. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomechanics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 927-934
- ISSN
- 0021-9290 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1969693271
- Cited by
- 504
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental verification and theoretical prediction of cartilage interstitial fluid pressurization at an impermeable contact interface in confined compression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9290(98)00105-5
- The paper
- Soltz, M. A., & Ateshian, G. A. (1998). Experimental verification and theoretical prediction of cartilage interstitial fluid pressurization at an impermeable contact interface in confined compression. Journal of Biomechanics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9290(98)00105-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.