The Effects of Damage and Microcracking on the Impact Strength of Bone
Abstract
Microcracking has been shown to occur when bone is 'damaged' as shown by a loss of stiffness. The effect on bone's toughness of the types of damage produced at low losses of stiffness are not known. We loaded bovine bone specimens in bending and tension to stiffness losses of up to 27%, and examined the microcracking produced. The tensile specimens had diffuse arrays of microcracks of 2-20 microm in length, characteristic of tensile loading, on all surfaces. The bending specimens showed tensile microcracking on the tensile surface and characteristic long, straight, cross-hatched compression cracks on the compressive surface. Specimens were then broken in impact. Those that had been damaged in bending were divided into two groups, in one group the part of the specimen which had undergone compression damage was placed in tension, and in the other group the tensile damage was placed in tension. Tensile damage loaded in tension did not reduce the bone's energy-absorbing ability in impact until a modulus reduction of over 20%. However compression damage loaded in tension did severely reduce the bone's energy absorption capabilities (by an average of about 40%).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
MCKs in densely damaged areas eventually coalesce to form fracture lines.
“Although our study differed by considering MCKs in terms of osteonal damage and not fracture lines, MCKs in densely damaged areas eventually coalesce to form fracture lines [33,34].”
From Osteonal Damage Patterns from Ballistic and Blunt Force Trauma in Human Long Bones (2024) · cites this paper as [33]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fantner, G. E., Hassenkam, T., Kindt, J. H., Weaver, J. C., Birkedal, H., Pechenik, L., Cutroni, J. A., Cidade, G. A. G., Stucky, G. D., Morse, D. E., et al. (2005) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat1428 · Cited by 933 · see citing works
Turnbull, T. L., Baumann, A. P., & Roeder, R. K. (2014) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.06.022 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Osteonal Damage Patterns from Ballistic and Blunt Force Trauma in Human Long Bones
Sexton, K., Schwab, N., Galtés, I., Casas, A., Armentano, N., Brillas, P., Garrido, X., & Jordana, X. (2024) · Life · doi:10.3390/life14020220 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Reilly, G. C., & Currey, J. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomechanics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 337-343
- ISSN
- 0021-9290
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review