Cited by 262Language Development and DisordersReading and Literacy DevelopmentDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Working memory and comprehension in children with specific language impairment: what we know so far

Montgomery, James W.·2003·Journal of Communication Disorders

Abstract

Many children with specific language impairments (SLI) demonstrate deficits in the areas of verbal working memory and language learning/processing. In this article, evidence is reviewed suggesting that the lexical/morphological learning and sentence comprehension/processing problems of many of these children are associated with their deficient working memory functioning. Evidence is also reviewed for the possibility that deficient working memory provides a clinical marker of SLI. A number of potentially useful assessment and intervention techniques are offered, as well as several directions for future research. The reader will be introduced to two prominent models of verbal working memory (phonological working memory model, functional working memory) and how each model potentially relates to (a) various language abilities in typically developing children, (b) the morphological and lexical learning abilities in children with specific language impairment (SLI), and (c) the sentence comprehension of children with SLI. The reader will also be provided a variety of clinical suggestions on how to assess and treat the working memory and language processing problems of children with SLI. Finally, some suggestions for future research will also be offered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9924(03)00021-2

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Montgomery, J. W.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Montgomery, James W.
Venue
Journal of Communication Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-05
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
221-231
ISSN
0021-9924 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136066737
Cited by
262
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 12
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Communication Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
specific language impairment, verbal working memory, sentence comprehension, vocabulary acquisition, morphological learning, language processing deficits, clinical biomarkers, assessment and intervention
MeSH terms
Child, Humans, Language, Language Disorders, Learning, Memory, Memory Disorders, Speech Perception, Speech Therapy, Comprehension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review