Cited by 618Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and InhibitionCrystallization and Solubility StudiesMicrobial Applications in Construction Materials

The role of magnesium in stabilising amorphous calcium carbonate and controlling calcite morphologies

Loste, Eva, Wilson, Rory M., Seshadri, Ram, Meldrum, Fiona C.·2003·Journal of Crystal Growth

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-0248(03)01153-9

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lower magnesium contents (10%) either delayed crystallization onset by up to 100% or changed the crystallization pathway.

    “This is comparable to other studies where lower magnesium contents (10%) either delayed the crystallization onset (by up to 100%; Reddy and Nancollas 1976; Loste et al. 2003; Raz et al. 2003) or changed the crystallization pathway (Rodriguez-Blanco et al. 2012).”

    From A route for the direct crystallization of dolomite (2015) · cites this paper as Loste et al. 2003

  • There is a direct proportionality between Mg content and crystallization induction time in the calcium carbonate system.

    “This is consistent with studies that showed a direct proportionality between Mg content and crystallization induction time in the calcium carbonate system (e.g., calcite formation; Reddy and Nancollas 1976; Tracy et al. 1998a, 1998b; Loste et al. 2003; Raz et al. 2003).”

    From A route for the direct crystallization of dolomite (2015) · cites this paper as Loste et al. 2003

  • Mg stabilization of amorphous calcium carbonate is due to the higher solvation energy of Mg2+ compared with Ca2+, making dehydration harder for transformation into anhydrous crystalline CaCO3.

    “It has been shown that Mg stabilization of ACC is due to the higher solvation energy of Mg2+ compared with Ca2+47, making it harder for dehydration to occur for transformation into anhydrous crystalline CaCO345.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Loste, E., Wilson, R. M., Seshadri, R., & Meldrum, F. C.
Affiliations
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Corresponding author
Meldrum, Fiona C.
Venue
Journal of Crystal Growth
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-06
Volume
254
Issue
1-2
Pages
206-218
ISSN
0022-0248 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2058749173
Cited by
618
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 31
FWCI
8.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Crystal Growth (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Crystallization and Solubility Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Microbial Applications in Construction Materials
Keywords
amorphous calcium carbonate, magnesium, high-Mg calcite, crystal nucleation, Mg/Ca ratio, crystal transformation, calcium carbonate precipitation, crystal growth mechanism, supersaturation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review