Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 757

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Separation and quantitation of subclasses of human plasma high density lipoproteins by a simple precipitation procedure

Open access
Gidez, L I, Miller, G J, Burstein, M, Slagle, S, Eder, H A·1982·Journal of Lipid Research

Abstract

Studies in recent years have suggested that measurement of high density lipoprotein (HDL) subclasses may provide significant information beyond that provided by measurement of total HDL. However, conventional methodology for separation of HDL subclasses involves various types of ultracentrifugation that are time-consuming, costly, and not suitable for many clinical or epidemiological studies. We have developed a simple precipitation method for the separation of HDL subclasses in human plasma. After precipitation of apoB-containing lipoproteins with heparin-Mn2+, HDL2 is precipitated by addition of dextran sulfate (mol wt 15,000). HDL2 cholesterol is calculated as the difference between total HDL cholesterol (heparin-Mn2+ supernatant) and HDL3 cholesterol (dextran sulfate supernatant). HDL2 determined by this method correlated well with results obtained by preparative ultracentrifugation (n = 295, r = 0.91) and analytical ultracentrifugation (n = 17, r = 0.92). In the original method final concentration of dextran sulfate was 0.09 g/dl; however further studies indicated that 0.13 g/dl is a more suitable concentration. The chemical compositions of HDL2 and HDL3 isolated by the precipitation method were very similar to those of HDL2 and HDL3 isolated by preparative ultracentrifugation. The concentration of HDL2 cholesterol was 40% higher in normal women than in normal men. In men with coronary heart disease, total HDL was decreased by 28%, HDL2 was decreased by 44%, while HDL3 was 19% lower. A similar pattern of change was found in women with coronary heart disease. In other conditions where total HDL either increased or decreased, the change in HDL2 was always proportionately greater than the change in total HDL. HDL3 showed relatively less change, and in some instances its concentration was unchanged. Thus HDL2 is the more variable component and may be a more meaningful index of altered HDL metabolism.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-2275(20)38059-7

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 757

Metadata

Authors
Gidez, L. I., Miller, G. J., Burstein, M., Slagle, S., & Eder, H. A.
Venue
Journal of Lipid Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1982-11
Volume
23
Issue
8
Pages
1206-1223
ISSN
0022-2275 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2189623052
Cited by
757
References
1
FWCI
20.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Separation and quantitation of subclasses of human plasma high density lipoproteins by a simple precipitation procedure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-2275(20)38059-7
The paper
Gidez, L. I., Miller, G. J., Burstein, M., Slagle, S., & Eder, H. A. (1982). Separation and quantitation of subclasses of human plasma high density lipoproteins by a simple precipitation procedure. Journal of Lipid Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-2275(20)38059-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.