The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lipid content and lipid type as determinants of the epidermal permeability barrier.
Open accessAbstract
During terminal differentiation, mammalian epidermal lipids undergo striking changes in both composition and distribution. Phospholipids and neutral lipids are replaced by a mixture of ceramides and neutral lipids organized in intercellular lamellar bilayers. Whether all of these lipids and/or whether specific lipid classes regulate permeability barrier function is not known. When hairless mice were treated with acetone, the degree of barrier perturbation (measured as transepidermal water loss, TEWL) increased linearly with the amount of lipid removed. Moreover, virtually all lipid species appeared to be removed by acetone treatment. In contrast, the nonpolar organic solvent, petroleum ether, while removing greater amounts of lipids, provoked lesser barrier abnormalities. As determined by both quantitative thin-layer chromatography and histochemistry, petroleum ether selectively extracted nonpolar lipids leaving sphingolipids and free sterols in place. In petroleum ether-treated animals, subsequent acetone treatment removed additional sphingolipids and produced a dramatic increase in TEWL. A linear relationship existed for the quantities of sphingolipid removed and degree of barrier disruption in acetone-treated, but not petroleum ether-treated animals. These results support a relationship between the total lipid content of the stratum corneum and barrier function. Secondly, although the results demonstrate the participation of the total lipid mixture in the barrier, removal of nonpolar species alone appears to cause only a modest level of barrier disruption, while removal of sphingolipids and free sterols leads to a more profound level of barrier perturbation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A RAPID METHOD OF TOTAL LIPID EXTRACTION AND PURIFICATION
Bligh, E. G., & Dyer, W. J. (1959) · Canadian Journal of Biochemistry and Physiology · doi:10.1139/o59-099 · Cited by 54,751
Cited by
Passive skin penetration enhancement and its quantification in vitro
Moser, K. (2001) · European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/s0939-6411(01)00166-7 · Cited by 553
Transepidermal water loss: the signal for recovery of barrier structure and function.
Grubauer, G., Elias, P. M., & Feingold, K. R. (1989) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-2275(20)38361-9 · Cited by 411
Self-citationStructure and function of the epidermal barrier
Wickett, R. R., & Visscher, M. O. (2006) · American Journal of Infection Control · doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2006.05.295 · Cited by 327
Marjukka Suhonen, T., A. Bouwstra, J., & Urtti, A. (1999) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/s0168-3659(98)00187-4 · Cited by 310
Fluhr, J. W., Feingold, K. R., & Elias, P. M. (2006) · Experimental Dermatology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0625.2006.00437.x · Cited by 262
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Grubauer, G., Feingold, K. R., Harris, R. M., & Elias, P. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Lipid Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1989-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 89-96
- ISSN
- 0022-2275 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2340018524
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lipid content and lipid type as determinants of the epidermal permeability barrier. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-2275(20)38401-7
- The paper
- Grubauer, G., Feingold, K. R., Harris, R. M., & Elias, P. M. (1989). Lipid content and lipid type as determinants of the epidermal permeability barrier. Journal of Lipid Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-2275(20)38401-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.