Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 325

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lipid content and lipid type as determinants of the epidermal permeability barrier.

Open access
Grubauer, G, Feingold, K R, Harris, R M, Elias, P M·1989·Journal of Lipid Research

Abstract

During terminal differentiation, mammalian epidermal lipids undergo striking changes in both composition and distribution. Phospholipids and neutral lipids are replaced by a mixture of ceramides and neutral lipids organized in intercellular lamellar bilayers. Whether all of these lipids and/or whether specific lipid classes regulate permeability barrier function is not known. When hairless mice were treated with acetone, the degree of barrier perturbation (measured as transepidermal water loss, TEWL) increased linearly with the amount of lipid removed. Moreover, virtually all lipid species appeared to be removed by acetone treatment. In contrast, the nonpolar organic solvent, petroleum ether, while removing greater amounts of lipids, provoked lesser barrier abnormalities. As determined by both quantitative thin-layer chromatography and histochemistry, petroleum ether selectively extracted nonpolar lipids leaving sphingolipids and free sterols in place. In petroleum ether-treated animals, subsequent acetone treatment removed additional sphingolipids and produced a dramatic increase in TEWL. A linear relationship existed for the quantities of sphingolipid removed and degree of barrier disruption in acetone-treated, but not petroleum ether-treated animals. These results support a relationship between the total lipid content of the stratum corneum and barrier function. Secondly, although the results demonstrate the participation of the total lipid mixture in the barrier, removal of nonpolar species alone appears to cause only a modest level of barrier disruption, while removal of sphingolipids and free sterols leads to a more profound level of barrier perturbation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-2275(20)38401-7

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 325

Metadata

Authors
Grubauer, G., Feingold, K. R., Harris, R. M., & Elias, P. M.
Venue
Journal of Lipid Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1989-01
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
89-96
ISSN
0022-2275 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2340018524
Cited by
325
References
1
FWCI
20.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lipid content and lipid type as determinants of the epidermal permeability barrier. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-2275(20)38401-7
The paper
Grubauer, G., Feingold, K. R., Harris, R. M., & Elias, P. M. (1989). Lipid content and lipid type as determinants of the epidermal permeability barrier. Journal of Lipid Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-2275(20)38401-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.