The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inhibition of cholesterol absorption in rats by plant sterols.
Open accessAbstract
The extent and site(s) of inhibition of cholesterol absorption by plant sterols, sitosterol and fucosterol, were studied in rats. The intragastric administration of a single emulsified lipid meal containing 25 mg [3H]cholesterol and 25 mg of either sitosterol or fucosterol inhibited the lymphatic absorption of cholesterol by 57% and 41%, respectively, in 24 hr. Less than 2% of each plant sterol was absorbed in the 24-hr period. In contrast, neither plant sterol (50 microM) inhibited cholesterol absorption when co-administered with equimolar amounts of cholesterol in phospholipid-bile salt micelles nor was either absorbed from the micellar solution. A series of in vitro studies was conducted to identify the site(s) of plant sterol inhibition of cholesterol absorption and to account for the difference in inhibitory effectiveness of sitosterol and fucosterol. A comparison of the micellar solubility of each sterol alone and in equimolar binary mixtures (to 2.0 mM) revealed that the solubility of individual sterols decreased in the following order: cholesterol, fucosterol, sitosterol, and that in binary mixtures cholesterol solubility was decreased by sitosterol and, to a lesser extent, by fucosterol relative to its solubility alone. A comparison between micellar-solubilized cholesterol and either sitosterol or fucosterol for binding to isolated brush border membranes, intestinal mucin, or for esterification by either cholesterol esterase or acyl coenzyme A:cholesterol acyltransferase revealed moderate to no competition. The data suggest that plant sterols displace cholesterol from bile salt (taurocholate) micelles and that sitosterol is more effective than fucosterol in this capacity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Burton, K. (1956) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj0620315 · Cited by 14,090
Cited by
P HYTOSTEROLS IN H UMAN N UTRITION
Ostlund, R. E. (2002) · Annual Review of Nutrition · doi:10.1146/annurev.nutr.22.020702.075220 · Cited by 632
Liu, L., Heinrich, M., Myers, S., & Dworjanyn, S. A. (2012) · Journal of Ethnopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.jep.2012.05.046 · Cited by 398
Identification of novel hypocholesterolemic peptides derived from bovine milk β-lactoglobulin.
Nagaoka, S., Futamura, Y., Miwa, K., Awano, T., Yamauchi, K., Kanamaru, Y., Tadashi, K., & Kuwata, T. (2001) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1006/bbrc.2001.4298 · Cited by 378
Nagaoka, S., Shimizu, K., Kaneko, H., Shibayama, F., Morikawa, K., Kanamaru, Y., Otsuka, A., Hirahashi, T., & Kato, T. (2005) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/135.10.2425 · Cited by 246
Cholesterol: From Feeding to Gene Regulation
Martini, C., & Pallottini, V. (2007) · Genes & Nutrition · doi:10.1007/s12263-007-0049-y · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Ikeda, I., Tanaka, K., Sugano, M., Vahouny, G. V., & Gallo, L. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Lipid Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1988-12
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1573-1582
- ISSN
- 0022-2275 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1856177890
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inhibition of cholesterol absorption in rats by plant sterols. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-2275(20)38403-0
- The paper
- Ikeda, I., Tanaka, K., Sugano, M., Vahouny, G. V., & Gallo, L. L. (1988). Inhibition of cholesterol absorption in rats by plant sterols. Journal of Lipid Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-2275(20)38403-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.