Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 866

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The amphipathic helix in the exchangeable apolipoproteins: a review of secondary structure and function.

Open access
Segrest, JP, Jones, MK, De Loof, H, Brouillette, CG, Venkatachalapathi, YV, Anantharamaiah, GM·1992·Journal of Lipid Research

Abstract

Site-directed mutagenesis and other molecular biology-based techniques are now available for probing the amphipathic alpha helix structural motif in the exchangeable apolipoproteins. Here we survey the published literature on lipid-binding and functional domains in apolipoproteins A-I, A-II, A-IV, C-I, C-II, C-III, and E and compare these results with recently developed computer methods for analysis of the location and properties of amphipathic helixes. This comparison suggests that there are at least three distinct classes of amphipathic helixes (classes A, Y, and G*) in the exchangeable apolipoproteins whose distribution varies within and between the seven apolipoproteins. This comparison further suggests that lipid affinity resides largely in class A amphipathic helixes (Segrest, J. P., et al. 1990. Proteins. 8: 103) and that variations in structure and/or numbers of class A domains in individual apolipoproteins allow a range of lipid affinities from high to low. The positions of the four alpha helixes recently shown to form a 4-helix bundle globular structure in apoE (Wilson, C., et al. 1991. Science. 252: 1817) correspond closely to the four amino-terminal class G* amphipathic helixes of apoE identified by our computer analysis. It is of particular interest, therefore, that all of the exchangeable apolipoproteins except apoA-II and C-I, contain amphipathic helixes of class G*. Additional implications of amphipathic helix heterogeneity for the structure and function of the exchangeable apolipoproteins will be discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-2275(20)41536-6

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 866

Metadata

Authors
Segrest, J., Jones, M., De Loof, H., Brouillette, C., Venkatachalapathi, Y., & Anantharamaiah, G.
Venue
Journal of Lipid Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-02
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
141-166
ISSN
0022-2275 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2401829918
Cited by
866
References
2
FWCI
12.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The amphipathic helix in the exchangeable apolipoproteins: a review of secondary structure and function. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-2275(20)41536-6
The paper
Segrest, J., Jones, M., De Loof, H., Brouillette, C., Venkatachalapathi, Y., & Anantharamaiah, G. (1992). The amphipathic helix in the exchangeable apolipoproteins: a review of secondary structure and function. Journal of Lipid Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-2275(20)41536-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.