The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting Changes in the Stability of Proteins and Protein Complexes: A Study of More Than 1000 Mutations
Abstract
We have developed a computer algorithm, FOLDEF (for FOLD-X energy function), to provide a fast and quantitative estimation of the importance of the interactions contributing to the stability of proteins and protein complexes. The predictive power of FOLDEF was tested on a very large set of point mutants (1088 mutants) spanning most of the structural environments found in proteins. FOLDEF uses a full atomic description of the structure of the proteins. The different energy terms taken into account in FOLDEF have been weighted using empirical data obtained from protein engineering experiments. First, we considered a training database of 339 mutants in nine different proteins and optimised the set of parameters and weighting factors that best accounted for the changes in stability of the mutants. The predictive power of the method was then tested using a blind test mutant database of 667 mutants, as well as a database of 82 protein-protein complex mutants. The global correlation obtained for 95 % of the entire mutant database (1030 mutants) is 0.83 with a standard deviation of 0.81 kcal mol(-1) and a slope of 0.76. The present energy function uses a minimum of computational resources and can therefore easily be used in protein design algorithms, and in the field of protein structure and folding pathways prediction where one requires a fast and accurate energy function. FOLDEF is available via a web-interface at http://fold-x.embl-heidelberg.de
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“They usually take a form of linear functions, often with only energy‐based terms, and fail to exploit evolution information, which can limit their ability to capture mutation effects on binding affinity.”
From iSEE: Interface structure, evolution, and energy-based machine learning predictor of binding affinity changes upon mutations (2019) · cites this paper as [6]
Citations
Cites
The interpretation of protein structures: Estimation of static accessibility
Lee, B., & Richards, F. M. (1971) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(71)90324-x · Cited by 5,884
Kollman, P. A., Massova, I., Reyes, C., Kuhn, B., Huo, S., Chong, L., Lee, M., Lee, T., Duan, Y., Wang, W., et al. (2000) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar000033j · Cited by 4,978
WHAT IF: A molecular modeling and drug design program
Vriend, G. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Graphics · doi:10.1016/0263-7855(90)80070-v · Cited by 3,476
Proteins: Structures and Molecular Properties
Creighton, T. E. (1986) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,645
Why are ?natively unfolded? proteins unstructured under physiologic conditions?
Uversky, V. N., Gillespie, J. R., & Fink, A. L. (2000) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/1097-0134(20001115)41:3 · Cited by 2,097
The Solubility of Amino Acids and Two Glycine Peptides in Aqueous Ethanol and Dioxane Solutions
Nozaki, Y., & Tanford, C. (1971) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(19)77210-x · Cited by 1,430
Proteins. Structures and molecular properties
(1984) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(84)90583-9 · Cited by 1,308
A simplified representation of protein conformations for rapid simulation of protein folding
Levitt, M. (1976) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(76)90004-8 · Cited by 1,123
Abagyan, R. A., & Totrov, M. M. (1994) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1994.1052 · Cited by 982
Itzhaki, L. S., Otzen, D. E., & Fersht, A. R. (1995) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1995.0616 · Cited by 750
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,001
Wainreb, G., Wolf, L., Ashkenazy, H., Dehouck, Y., & Ben‐Tal, N. (2011) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr576 · Cited by 59
Scheller, R., Stein, A., Nielsen, S. V., Marin, F. I., Gerdes, A., Marco, M. D., Papaleo, E., Lindorff‐Larsen, K., & Hartmann‐Petersen, R. (2019) · Human Mutation · doi:10.1002/humu.23707 · Cited by 57
Huang, X., Zheng, W. H., Pearce, R., & Zhang, Y. (2019) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz926 · Cited by 59
Karakoyun, H. K., Yüksel, Ş., Amanoglu, I., Naserikhojasteh, L., Yeşilyurt, A., Yakıcıer, C., Timuçin, E., & Akyerli, C. B. (2023) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2023.1052383 · Cited by 66
“Hitherto, many different stability predictors have been developed (Guerois et al., 2002; Bershtein et al., 2006; Kebabci et al., 2022) and reported to show promise in distinguishing pathogenic variants (Gaboriau et al.”
BackgroundMonsellier, É., & Bedouelle, H. (2005) · Protein Engineering Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/gzi046 · Cited by 58
Identification of RASSF8 as a candidate lung tumor suppressor gene
Falvella, F. S., Manenti, G., Spinola, M., Pignatiello, C., Conti, B., Pastorino, U., & Dragani, T. A. (2006) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1209422 · Cited by 57
An Evolution-Based Approach to De Novo Protein Design and Case Study on Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Mitra, P., Shultis, D., Brender, J., Czajka, J. J., Marsh, D., Gray, F., Cierpicki, T., & Zhang, Y. (2013) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003298 · Cited by 57
“0b5 [53], designed to further enhance the stability and local structure packing of designed sequence.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialChen, P., Li, J., Wong, L., Kuwahara, H., Huang, J. Z., & Gao, X. (2013) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24278 · Cited by 57
EvoDesign: de novo protein design based on structural and evolutionary profiles
Mitra, P., Shultis, D., & Zhang, Y. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt384 · Cited by 57
Peng, Y., & Alexov, E. G. (2015) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24968 · Cited by 57
Mishra, S. K., & Jernigan, R. L. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0199225 · Cited by 54
Lin, X., Zhang, X., & Xu, X. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1109/tcbb.2019.2931717 · Cited by 58
“Robetta [50] and FOLDEF [61] are the methods based on alanine mutation scans.”
MethodKepp, K. P. (2015) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.bbapap.2015.06.002 · Cited by 57
Dourado, D. F. A. R., & Flores, S. C. (2014) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24634 · Cited by 56
“8,12,19,36–39 KB potentials have become widely accepted for evaluating protein–protein interaction energy.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPrediction of protein binding sites and hot spots
Fernández‐Recio, J. (2011) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.45 · Cited by 58
Point Mutations in Protein Globular Domains: Contributions from Function, Stability and Misfolding
Sanchez, I. E., Tejero, J., Gómez‐Moreno, C., Medina, M., & Serrano, L. G. (2006) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2006.08.020 · Cited by 56
Self-citationOptimization algorithms for functional deimmunization of therapeutic proteins
Parker, A. S., Zheng, W. H., Griswold, K. E., & Bailey‐Kellogg, C. (2010) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-180 · Cited by 57
Systematic identification of phosphorylation-mediated protein interaction switches
Betts, M. J., Wichmann, O., Utz, M., André, T., Petsalaki, E., Mínguez, P., Parca, L., Roth, F. P., Gavin, A., Bork, P., et al. (2017) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005462 · Cited by 59
“The Dynein Ser-88 phosphosite is known to disable homodimerisation [40] but FoldX gives a negative ΔΔG (-4.83 Kcal/mol), with energy minimisation causing the two Serines that point towards each other in the unphosphorylated structure (top) to point away from each other when phosphorylated (bottom) rather than preventi…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPremPDI estimates and interprets the effects of missense mutations on protein-DNA interactions
Zhang, N., Chen, Y., Zhao, F., Yang, Q., Simonetti, F. L., & Li, M. (2018) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006615 · Cited by 56
Agajanian, S., Odeyemi, O., & Verkhivker, G. M. (2019) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2019.00044 · Cited by 57
“We also employed the Foldx method (Guerois et al., 2002; Schymkowitz et al., 2005; Tokuriki et al., 2007; Van Durme et al., 2011) that allows for robust assessment of mutational effects on protein stability.”
MethodEngineering Stability, Viscosity, and Immunogenicity of Antibodies by Computational Design
Kuroda, D., & Tsumoto, K. (2020) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.xphs.2020.01.011 · Cited by 59
Zhou, X., Wang, Y., Li, X., Zhou, J., Yang, W., Wang, X., Jiao, S., Zuo, W., You, Z., Ying, W., et al. (2024) · Redox Biology · doi:10.1016/j.redox.2024.103182 · Cited by 56
“For the reverse mutations ( ΔΔ Gmut → wt), the 3D structures of mutants were produced with BuildModel module of FoldX [32] using wild-type protein structures as the templates.”
MethodMutation Bias Favors Protein Folding Stability in the Evolution of Small Populations
Méndez, R., Fritsche, M., Porto, M., & Bastolla, U. (2010) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000767 · Cited by 55
Structural and sequential context of p53: A review of experimental and theoretical evidence
Saha, T., Kar, R. K., & Sa, G. (2014) · Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2014.12.002 · Cited by 58
Traxlmayr, M. W., Hasenhindl, C., Hackl, M., Stadlmayr, G., Rybka, J. D., Borth, N., Grillari, J., Rüker, F., & Obinger, C. (2012) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2012.07.017 · Cited by 55
Environmental Dependence of Genetic Constraint
de Vos, M. G. J., Poelwijk, F. J., Battich, N., Ndika, J., & Tans, S. J. (2013) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003580 · Cited by 54
Milenkovic, V. M., Röhrl, E., Weber, B. H. F., & Strauß, O. (2011) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.085878 · Cited by 54
Lima, J. P., Feijão, T., da Silva, A. F., Pereira‐Castro, I., Fernandez-Ballester, G. J., Máximo, V., Herrero, A., Serrano, L., Sobrinho-Simões, M. A., & García‐Rostán, G. (2007) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2007-0640 · Cited by 53
Self-citationMandawe, J., Infanzón, B., Eisele, A., Zaun, H., Kuballa, J., Davari, M. D., Jakob, F., Elling, L., & Schwaneberg, U. (2018) · ChemBioChem · doi:10.1002/cbic.201800093 · Cited by 56
Measuring glycolytic flux in single yeast cells with an orthogonal synthetic biosensor
Monteiro, F., Hubmann, G., Takhaveev, V., Vedelaar, S. R., Norder, J., Hekelaar, J., Saldida, J., Litsios, A., Wijma, H. J., Schmidt, A., et al. (2019) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.15252/msb.20199071 · Cited by 54
Systematic Investigation of the Data Set Dependency of Protein Stability Predictors
Caldararu, O. F., Mehra, R., Blundell, T. L., & Kepp, K. P. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00591 · Cited by 52
Genotype–Phenotype Correlations in Central Precocious Puberty Caused by MKRN3 Mutations
Seraphim, C. E., Canton, A. P. M., Montenegro, L. R., Piovesan, M. R., Macedo, D. B., Cunha, M., Guimarães, A. S. D. S., Ramos, C. O., Benedetti, A. F. F., Leal, A. D. C., et al. (2020) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/clinem/dgaa955 · Cited by 54
Cierpicki, T., & Grembecka, J. (2015) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/imr.12244 · Cited by 53
“Furthermore, the PPI interfaces have relatively tight packing (36), and mutations predominantly weaken PPIs (37).”
BackgroundYazar, M., & Özbek, P. (2020) · OMICS A Journal of Integrative Biology · doi:10.1089/omi.2020.0141 · Cited by 53
“This technique can also be utilized for a quantitative estimation of SNP effect in terms of protein– protein interactions (Guerois et al., 2002).”
Molecular Modeling of the Full-length Human TRPV1 Channel in Closed and Desensitized States
Fernandez-Ballester, G. J., & Ferrer-Montiel, A. V. (2008) · The Journal of Membrane Biology · doi:10.1007/s00232-008-9123-7 · Cited by 53
Kamisetty, H., Ramanathan, A., Bailey‐Kellogg, C., & LANGMEAD, C. J. (2010) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.22894 · Cited by 53
Protein evolution along phylogenetic histories under structurally constrained substitution models
Arenas, M., Santos, H. G. D., Posada, D., & Bastolla, U. (2013) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt530 · Cited by 52
Wang, J., & Yao, L. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-56607-4 · Cited by 53
Intraocular pressure measurement with instrumented contact lenses.
Greene, M. E., & Gilman, B. G. (1974) · PubMed · Cited by 53
Using machine learning to predict the effects and consequences of mutations in proteins
Diaz, D. J., Kulikova, A. V., Ellington, A. D., & Wilke, C. O. (2023) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2022.102518 · Cited by 54
Parthiban, V., Gromiha, M. M., Abhinandan, M., & Schomburg, D. (2007) · BMC Structural Biology · doi:10.1186/1472-6807-7-54 · Cited by 52
Balancing the Stability–Activity Trade‐Off by Fine‐Tuning Dehalogenase Access Tunnels
Lišková, V., Bednář, D., Prudniková, T., Řezáčová, P., Koudeláková, T., Šebestová, E., Smatanová, I. K., Brezovský, J., Chaloupková, R., & Damborský, J. (2015) · ChemCatChem · doi:10.1002/cctc.201402792 · Cited by 52
Bloom, J. D., Nayak, J. S., & Baltimore, D. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022201 · Cited by 52
Model Structure of Human APOBEC3G
Zhang, K., Mangeat, B., Ortiz, M., Zoete, V., Trono, D., Telenti, A., & Michielin, O. A. (2007) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000378 · Cited by 51
Segura, J., Jones, P. F., & Fernández‐Fuentes, N. (2011) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-352 · Cited by 51
Application of Rigidity Theory to the Thermostabilization of Lipase A from Bacillus subtilis
Rathi, P. C., Fulton, A., Jaeger, K., & Gohlke, H. (2016) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004754 · Cited by 51
“Finally, our approach does not require weighting or fitting parameters, in contrast to other methods [27,30,31,66].”
ResultIqbal, S., Li, F., Akutsu, T., Ascher, D. B., Webb, G. I., & Song, J. (2021) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbab184 · Cited by 51
Caballero, J., Fernández, L., Abreu, J. I., & Fernández, M. (2006) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci050507z · Cited by 51
Documentation of an Imperative To Improve Methods for Predicting Membrane Protein Stability
Kroncke, B. M., Duran, A. M., Mendenhall, J. L., Meiler, J., Blume, J. D., & Sanders, C. R. (2016) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.biochem.6b00537 · Cited by 50
Biocatalytic and Structural Properties of a Highly Engineered Halohydrin Dehalogenase
Schallmey, M., Floor, R. J., Hauer, B., Breuer, M., Jekel, P. A., Wijma, H. J., Dijkstra, B. W., & Janssen, D. B. (2013) · ChemBioChem · doi:10.1002/cbic.201300005 · Cited by 50
Crosstalk between Signaling Pathways Provided by Single and Multiple Protein Phosphorylation Sites
Nishi, H., Demir, E., & Panchenko, A. R. (2014) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2014.11.001 · Cited by 49
Structural Basis for the SOX-Dependent Genomic Redistribution of OCT4 in Stem Cell Differentiation
Merino, F., Ng, C. K. L., Veerapandian, V., Schöler, H. R., Jauch, R., & Cojocaru, V. (2014) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2014.06.014 · Cited by 51
“We optimized side chain rotamers, calculated structural water positions, and determined the orientation of asparagines, glutamines, and histidines with FoldX (Guerois et al., 2002; Schymkowitz et al., 2005).”
MethodFajardo-Sánchez, E., Stricher, F., Pâques, F., Isalan, M., & Serrano, L. (2008) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkn059 · Cited by 50
Self-citationA robust cosolvent-compatible halohydrin dehalogenase by computational library design
Arabnejad, H., Lago, M. D., Jekel, P. A., Floor, R. J., Thunnissen, A. M. W. H., van Scheltinga, A. C. T., Wijma, H. J., & Janssen, D. B. (2016) · Protein Engineering Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/gzw068 · Cited by 50
“Stabilizing mutations predicted by computational tools Energy calculations with FoldX (Guerois et al., 2002) and Rosetta (Kellogg et al., 2011) were used to identify potentially stabilizing point mutations in halohydrin dehalogenase (HheC).”
MethodA loop engineering strategy improves laccase lcc2 activity in ionic liquid and aqueous solution
Wallraf, A., Liu, H., Zhu, L., Khalfallah, G., Simons, C., Alibiglou, H., Davari, M. D., & Schwaneberg, U. (2018) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c7gc03776g · Cited by 50
Echave, J., Jackson, E. L., & Wilke, C. O. (2015) · Physical Biology · doi:10.1088/1478-3975/12/2/025002 · Cited by 50
“We calculated ΔΔ G values with the program FoldX, following the default protocol (Guerois et al. 2002, Schymkowitz et al. 2005).”
MethodZoete, V., & Meuwly, M. (2006) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20512 · Cited by 50
In silico approach for the discovery of new PPARγ modulators among plant-derived polyphenols
Encinar, J. A., Fernandez-Ballester, G. J., Galiano, V., & Micol, V. (2015) · Drug Design Development and Therapy · doi:10.2147/dddt.s93449 · Cited by 52
“All of the selected protein structures were then subjected to geometry optimization using the repair function of the FoldX algorithm.(28,29) To perform docking with AutoDock/Vina, the receptor and ligand structures were transformed to the pdbqt file format, which includes atomic charges, atom-type definitions and, for…”
Computational protein design: The proteus software and selected applications
Simonson, T., Gaillard, T., Mignon, D., Busch, M. S. A., Lopes, A., Amara, N., Polydorides, S., Sedano, A., Druart, K., & Archontis, G. (2013) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.23418 · Cited by 52
Redox Biology: Computational Approaches to the Investigation of Functional Cysteine Residues
Marino, S. M., & Gladyshev, V. N. (2010) · Antioxidants and Redox Signaling · doi:10.1089/ars.2010.3561 · Cited by 50
Elucidation of the binding preferences of peptide recognition modules: SH3 and PDZ domains
Teyra, J., Sidhu, S. S., & Kim, P. M. (2012) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2012.05.043 · Cited by 50
Carlin, D. A., Caster, R. W., Wang, X., Betzenderfer, S. A., Chen, C. X., Duong, V. M., Ryklansky, C. V., Alpekin, A., Beaumont, N., Kapoor, H., et al. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0147596 · Cited by 49
“[7,8,9] Current algorithms for protein redesign, in contrast, are not directly trained on experimentally measured effects, but rather indirect measures such as sequence recovery ( i . e . the ability to recapitulate a known active site after running a design simulation).”
BackgroundFernández, L., Caballero, J., Abreu, J. I., & Fernández, M. (2007) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.21349 · Cited by 49
Effective scoring function for protein sequence design
Liang, S., & Grishin, N. V. (2003) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10560 · Cited by 49
Free energy perturbation calculations of the thermodynamics of protein side-chain mutations
Steinbrecher, T., Abel, R., Clark, A., & Friesner, R. (2017) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2017.03.002 · Cited by 46
Characterization of a novel RP2–OSTF1 interaction and its implication for actin remodelling
Lyraki, R., Lokaj, M., Soares, D. C., Little, A., Vermeren, M., Marsh, J. A., Wittinghofer, A., & Hurd, T. W. (2018) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.211748 · Cited by 47
“Next, we identified docking models that meet the following criteria: (1) the interaction involves both the N-domain (residues 13–73) and C-terminal domain (residues 74–190); (2) the OSTF1-binding surface does not overlap with the known SH3-binding pocket (residues 21–24, 26–30, 35, 46–49, 60, 62, 64–65, 68–69); (3) no…”
MethodInfluentialLynch syndrome, molecular mechanisms and variant classification
Abildgaard, A. B., Nielsen, S. V., Bernstein, I., Stein, A., Lindorff‐Larsen, K., & Hartmann‐Petersen, R. (2022) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41416-022-02059-z · Cited by 47
“Thus, in previous research, the FoldX and Rosetta algorithms were used to produce stability predictions of all possible missense variants of MSH2 [68], MLH1 [50] and a range of other proteins [96–98].”
MethodInfluentialChristensen, N. J., & Kepp, K. P. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct4002152 · Cited by 46
Toward Classification of BRCA1 Missense Variants Using a Biophysical Approach
Rowling, P. J. E., Cook, R. S., & Itzhaki, L. S. (2010) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m109.088922 · Cited by 48
Dixit, A., Torkamani, A., Schork, N. J., & Verkhivker, G. M. (2009) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2008.10.041 · Cited by 48
Burkovitz, A., Sela‐Culang, I., & Ofran, Y. (2013) · FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/febs.12597 · Cited by 48
Solvent‐accessible surface area: How well can be applied to hot‐spot detection?
Martins, J. M. D. S., Ramos, R. M., Pimenta, A. C., & Moreira, I. S. (2013) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24413 · Cited by 48
Davari, M. D., Kopka, B., Wingen, M., Bocola, M., Drepper, T., Jaeger, K., Schwaneberg, U., & Krauß, U. (2016) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b01512 · Cited by 48
Patel, J. S., & Ytreberg, F. M. (2017) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00660 · Cited by 48
Pozzi, L., Valenza, F., Mosca, L., Mas, A. D., Domi, T., Romano, A., Tarlarini, C., Falzone, Y., Tremolizzo, L., Sorarú, G., et al. (2017) · Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2017-316174 · Cited by 50
Tong, M., Pelton, J., Gill, M. L., Zhang, W., Picart, F., & Seeliger, M. A. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-02240-6 · Cited by 49
X‐ray vs. NMR structures as templates for computational protein design
Schneider, M., Fu, X., & Keating, A. E. (2009) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.22421 · Cited by 48
DIP/Dpr interactions and the evolutionary design of specificity in protein families
Sergeeva, A. P., Katsamba, P. S., Cosmanescu, F., Brewer, J. J., Ahlsen, G., Mannepalli, S., Shapiro, L., & Honig, B. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15981-8 · Cited by 38
Ansar, M., Ebstein, F., Özkoç, H., Paracha, S. A., Iwaszkiewicz, J., Gesemann, M., Zoete, V., Ranza, E., Santoni, F. A., Sarwar, M. T., et al. (2020) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddaa032 · Cited by 44
Computational approaches to understanding protein aggregation in neurodegeneration
Redler, R. L., Shirvanyants, D. G., Dağliyan, O., Ding, F., Kim, D. N., Kota, P. B., Proctor, E. A., Ramachandran, S., Tandon, A., & Dokholyan, N. V. (2014) · Journal of Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1093/jmcb/mju007 · Cited by 47
“To address the fact that the folded state is the starting point of aggregation, the stability of the folded state is taken into consideration in the TANGO algorithm using Fold-X (Guerois et al .”
MethodHaupt, J., Deichsel, A., Stange, K., Ast, C., Bocciardi, R., Ravazzolo, R., Rocco, M. D., Ferrari, P., Landi, A., Kaplan, F. S., et al. (2014) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddu255 · Cited by 47
Stetz, G., & Verkhivker, G. M. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0143752 · Cited by 46
“The protein stability changes in DnaK structures were computed using the FoldX approach [123,124].”
MethodDeng, L., Guan, J., Wei, X., Yi, Y., Zhang, Q. C., & Zhou, S. (2013) · Journal of Computational Biology · doi:10.1089/cmb.2013.0083 · Cited by 49
“Only in specificity, FOLDEF and MINERVA2”
MethodResultInfluentialStetz, G., & Verkhivker, G. M. (2016) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00755 · Cited by 45
Markel, U., Zhu, L., Frauenkron‐Machedjou, V. J., Zhao, J. B., Bocola, M., Davari, M. D., Jaeger, K., & Schwaneberg, U. (2017) · Catalysts · doi:10.3390/catal7050142 · Cited by 47
“8 [45] using the YASARA-FoldX plugin [46,47].”
Li, F., Geng, M., Liu, C., Wang, J., Min, W., & Liu, J. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0215609 · Cited by 47
Hoppe, C., & Schomburg, D. (2005) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.04940705 · Cited by 47
Wee, J., & Xia, K. (2022) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbac024 · Cited by 48
How Structural and Physicochemical Determinants Shape Sequence Constraints in a Functional Enzyme
Abriata, L. A., Palzkill, T. G., & Peraro, M. D. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118684 · Cited by 46
“A set of 28 descriptors was assembled that describes different properties of the amino acids with low correlation to each other (S1 Table), based on previous works that developed minimal complete sets of amino acid properties [36,37] and combinations of them.”
MethodBoutwell, C. L., Carlson, J. M., Lin, T.-H., Seese, A. M., Power, K. A., Peng, J., Tang, Y., Brumme, Z. L., Heckerman, D. E., Schneidewind, A., et al. (2013) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.03233-12 · Cited by 48
Hall, E. A., Nahorski, M. S., Murray, L. M., Shaheen, R., Perkins, E., Dissanayake, K. N., Kristaryanto, Y., Jones, R. A., Vogt, J., Rivagorda, M., et al. (2017) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.03.008 · Cited by 45
“The resulting mean energy is expressed in kcal/mol, and the prediction decision on whether the mutation destabilizes structure is based upon Schymkowitz et al.43 and Guirois et al.44 where severely reduced structural stability DDG is considered to be >1.6 kcal/mol.”
BackgroundInfluentialAverage assignment method for predicting the stability of protein mutants
Saraboji, K., Gromiha, M. M., & Ponnuswamy, M. N. (2006) · Biopolymers · doi:10.1002/bip.20462 · Cited by 46
Four-Body Scoring Function for Mutagenesis
Deutsch, C., & Krishnamoorthy, B. (2007) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm481 · Cited by 46
Cho, S., Swaminathan, C. P., Yang, J., Kerzic, M. C., Guan, R., Kieke, M. C., Kranz, D. M., Mariuzza, R. A., & Sundberg, E. J. (2005) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2005.08.015 · Cited by 46
A dual-reporter system for investigating and optimizing protein translation and folding in E. coli
Zutz, A., Hamborg, L., Pedersen, L. E., Kassem, M. M., Papaleo, E., Koza, A., Herrgård, M. J., Jensen, S. I., Teilum, K., Lindorff‐Larsen, K., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26337-1 · Cited by 49
Groseclose, T. M., & Nguyen, H. B. (2025) · Communications Materials · doi:10.1038/s43246-025-00919-8 · Cited by 51
Gong, S., & Blundell, T. L. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009186 · Cited by 45
Chen, T. S., & Keating, A. E. (2012) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.2096 · Cited by 44
Molecular Determinants of Mutant Phenotypes, Inferred from Saturation Mutagenesis Data
Tripathi, A., Gupta, K., Khare, S., Jain, P. C., Patel, S., Kumar, P., Pulianmackal, A. J., Aghera, N. K., & Varadarajan, R. (2016) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msw182 · Cited by 45
“…saturation mutagenesis studies can be used to improve predictions of effects of nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms on protein activity (Guerois et al. 2002; Randles et al. 2006; Yue and Moult 2006; Bromberg et al. 2008; Radivojac et al. 2013) as well as for protein threading…”
BackgroundIshizuka, K., Yoshida, T., Kawabata, T., Imai, A., Mori, H., Kimura, H., Inada, T., Okahisa, Y., Egawa, J., Usami, M., et al. (2020) · Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders · doi:10.1186/s11689-020-09325-2 · Cited by 49
“We also estimated protein stability changes using the program FoldX [70] based on the crystal structure (PDB ID: 3r05).”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Guerois, R., Nielsen, J. E., & Serrano, L.
- Affiliations
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
- Venue
- Journal of Molecular Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-07
- Volume
- 320
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 369-387
- ISSN
- 0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2092387745
- Cited by
- 1,728
- References
- 95
- Citations by year
- 2026: 68 · 2025: 85 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 90 · 2020: 98 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 90 · 2017: 84 · 2016: 94 · 2015: 93 · 2014: 90 · 2013: 102 · 2012: 87
- FWCI
- 12.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- protein stability prediction, point mutations, protein-protein complex, parameter optimization, protein design, protein folding pathways
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Hydrogen Bonding, Models, Genetic, Mutation, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Software, Thermodynamics, Water, Models, Statistical, Point Mutation, Protein Structure, Secondary, Protein Folding, Databases as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review