The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting Changes in the Stability of Proteins and Protein Complexes: A Study of More Than 1000 Mutations
Abstract
We have developed a computer algorithm, FOLDEF (for FOLD-X energy function), to provide a fast and quantitative estimation of the importance of the interactions contributing to the stability of proteins and protein complexes. The predictive power of FOLDEF was tested on a very large set of point mutants (1088 mutants) spanning most of the structural environments found in proteins. FOLDEF uses a full atomic description of the structure of the proteins. The different energy terms taken into account in FOLDEF have been weighted using empirical data obtained from protein engineering experiments. First, we considered a training database of 339 mutants in nine different proteins and optimised the set of parameters and weighting factors that best accounted for the changes in stability of the mutants. The predictive power of the method was then tested using a blind test mutant database of 667 mutants, as well as a database of 82 protein-protein complex mutants. The global correlation obtained for 95 % of the entire mutant database (1030 mutants) is 0.83 with a standard deviation of 0.81 kcal mol(-1) and a slope of 0.76. The present energy function uses a minimum of computational resources and can therefore easily be used in protein design algorithms, and in the field of protein structure and folding pathways prediction where one requires a fast and accurate energy function. FOLDEF is available via a web-interface at http://fold-x.embl-heidelberg.de
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“They usually take a form of linear functions, often with only energy‐based terms, and fail to exploit evolution information, which can limit their ability to capture mutation effects on binding affinity.”
From iSEE: Interface structure, evolution, and energy-based machine learning predictor of binding affinity changes upon mutations (2019) · cites this paper as [6]
Citations
Cites
The interpretation of protein structures: Estimation of static accessibility
Lee, B., & Richards, F. M. (1971) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(71)90324-x · Cited by 5,884
Kollman, P. A., Massova, I., Reyes, C., Kuhn, B., Huo, S., Chong, L., Lee, M., Lee, T., Duan, Y., Wang, W., et al. (2000) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar000033j · Cited by 4,978
WHAT IF: A molecular modeling and drug design program
Vriend, G. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Graphics · doi:10.1016/0263-7855(90)80070-v · Cited by 3,476
Proteins: Structures and Molecular Properties
Creighton, T. E. (1986) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,645
Why are ?natively unfolded? proteins unstructured under physiologic conditions?
Uversky, V. N., Gillespie, J. R., & Fink, A. L. (2000) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/1097-0134(20001115)41:3 · Cited by 2,097
The Solubility of Amino Acids and Two Glycine Peptides in Aqueous Ethanol and Dioxane Solutions
Nozaki, Y., & Tanford, C. (1971) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(19)77210-x · Cited by 1,430
Proteins. Structures and molecular properties
(1984) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(84)90583-9 · Cited by 1,308
A simplified representation of protein conformations for rapid simulation of protein folding
Levitt, M. (1976) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(76)90004-8 · Cited by 1,123
Abagyan, R. A., & Totrov, M. M. (1994) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1994.1052 · Cited by 982
Itzhaki, L. S., Otzen, D. E., & Fersht, A. R. (1995) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1995.0616 · Cited by 750
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,001
Identification of pathogenic missense mutations using protein stability predictors
Gerasimavicius, L., Liu, X., & Marsh, J. A. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-72404-w · Cited by 117
Clark, A. J., Negron, C., Hauser, K., Sun, M., Wang, L., Abel, R., & Friesner, R. A. (2019) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2019.02.003 · Cited by 91
“We have additionally compared the results to those found using foldX [5] and found the overall results to be very similar to those given by mm-GB/ SA.”
MethodResultInfluentialPredicting the Impact of Missense Mutations on Protein–Protein Binding Affinity
Li, M., Petukh, M., Alexov, E., & Panchenko, A. R. (2014) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct401022c · Cited by 111
Computational enzyme design approaches with significant biological outcomes: progress and challenges
Li, X.-M., Zhang, Z.-D., & Song, J. (2012) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.5936/csbj.201209007 · Cited by 103
Correlating protein function and stability through the analysis of single amino acid substitutions
Bromberg, Y., & Rost, B. (2009) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-s8-s8 · Cited by 111
SAAMBE-3D: Predicting Effect of Mutations on Protein–Protein Interactions
Pahari, S., Li, G., Murthy, A. K., Liang, S., Fragoza, R., Yu, H., & Alexov, E. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21072563 · Cited by 111
“1 with leave one complex out cross-validation, which outperforms FoldX [41,42] and BeAtMuSiC [35] with PCC of 0.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThermostability engineering of industrial enzymes through structure modification
Nezhad, N. G., Rahman, R. N. Z. R. A., Normi, Y. M., Oslan, S. N., Shariff, F. M., & Leow, T. C. (2022) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-022-12067-x · Cited by 111
Mátyás, G., Arnold, E., Carrel, T. P., Baumgartner, D., Boileau, C., Berger, W., & Steinmann, B. U. (2006) · Human Mutation · doi:10.1002/humu.20353 · Cited by 111
Assessing predictors of changes in protein stability upon mutation using self-consistency
Thiltgen, G., & Goldstein, R. A. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046084 · Cited by 110
Caulfield, T. R., Fiesel, F. C., Moussaud-Lamodière, E. L., Dourado, D. F. A. R., Flores, S. C., & Springer, W. (2014) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003935 · Cited by 109
“FoldX was utilized as a plugin within YASARA to achieve mutant comparisons.”
MethodClark, A. J., Gindin, T., Zhang, B., Wang, L., Abel, R., Murret, C. S., Xu, F., Bao, A., Lu, N. J., Zhou, T., et al. (2017) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2016.11.021 · Cited by 96
“For comparison, we show the results of FEP/REST in comparison to foldX [31], a popular empirical method of predicting alanine scan mutation values, which takes a negligible amount of computing time compared to the FEP/REST simulation time (less than 5 min per structure on a single processor versus ~12– 72 h on 4 GPU c…”
MethodLise, S., Archambeau, C., Pontil, M., & Jones, D. T. (2009) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-365 · Cited by 107
Computational design of enzymes for biotechnological applications
Planas-Iglesias, J., Marques, S. M., Pinto, G., Musil, M., Štourač, J., Damborský, J., & Bednář, D. (2021) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2021.107696 · Cited by 107
Machine-Directed Evolution of an Imine Reductase for Activity and Stereoselectivity
Ma, E. J., Siirola, E., Moore, C. M., Kummer, A., Stoeckli, M., Faller, M., Bouquet, C., Eggimann, F. K., Ligibel, M., Huynh, D., et al. (2021) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.1c02786 · Cited by 110
A structure‐based approach to predict predisposition to amyloidosis
Ahmed, A. B., Znassi, N., Château, M., & Kajava, A. V. (2014) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2014.06.007 · Cited by 109
Tools for Predicting the Functional Impact of Nonsynonymous Genetic Variation
Tang, H., & Thomas, P. D. (2016) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.116.190033 · Cited by 114
Steinbrecher, T. B., Zhu, C., Wang, L., Abel, R., Negron, C., Pearlman, D. A., Feyfant, E., Duan, J., & Sherman, W. (2016) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2016.12.007 · Cited by 109
Petukh, M., Li, M., & Alexov, E. (2015) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004276 · Cited by 107
“(for some examples see [21–29]).”
Enhanced Prediction of Hot Spots at Protein-Protein Interfaces Using Extreme Gradient Boosting
Wang, H., Liu, C., & Deng, L. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-32511-1 · Cited by 111
Backbone flexibility in computational protein design
Mandell, D. J., & Kortemme, T. (2009) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2009.07.006 · Cited by 106
Structural dynamics flexibility informs function and evolution at a proteome scale
Gerek, Z. N., Kumar, S., & Ozkan, S. B. (2013) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/eva.12052 · Cited by 103
Heimer, G., Kerätär, J. M., Riley, L. G., Balasubramaniam, S., Eyal, E., Pietikäinen, L. P., Hiltunen, J. K., Marek‐Yagel, D., Hamada, J., Gregory, A., et al. (2016) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.09.021 · Cited by 103
“Thermo stability calculations were done using Cupsat,16 duet,17 mCSM,18 MAESTRO,19 SDM,20 I Mutant2,21 and Fold-X.22 Functional predictions of various programs including Sift,23 PolyPhen2,24 MutationTaster,25 MutationAssessor,26 LRT, and PROVEAN27 were collected from the dbNSFP database.28 Structural alignment between…”
MethodKiel, C., Wohlgemuth, S., Rousseau, F., Schymkowitz, J. W. H., Ferkinghoff‐Borg, J., Wittinghofer, F., & Serrano, L. (2005) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2005.02.046 · Cited by 102
Self-citationPires, D. E. V., Chen, J., Blundell, T. L., & Ascher, D. B. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep19848 · Cited by 102
Ayaz, P., Lyczek, A., Paung, Y., Mingione, V. R., Iacob, R. E., de Waal, P. W., Engen, J. R., Seeliger, M. A., Shan, Y., & Shaw, D. E. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-36956-5 · Cited by 110
Lafont, V., Schaefer, M., Stote, R. H., Altschuh, D., & Dejaegere, A. P. (2007) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.21259 · Cited by 108
McEntagart, M., Williamson, K. A., Rainger, J. K., Wheeler, A. P., Seawright, A., Baere, E. B. W. D., Verdin, H., Bergendahl, L. T., Quigley, A. J., Rainger, J., et al. (2016) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.03.018 · Cited by 101
“To address this, we predicted the structural destabilization [35] of pathogenic missense mutations with a known or likely dominant-negative mechanism from proteins that form transmembrane channels, and compared them to recessive mutations from the same proteins or dominant mutations from genes with…”
Modulating protein stability – directed evolution strategies for improved protein function
Socha, R. D., & Tokuriki, N. (2013) · FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/febs.12354 · Cited by 102
Geng, C., Xue, L. C., Roel‐Touris, J., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2019) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1410 · Cited by 104
“Early ΔΔ G predictors such as FoldX 56,57 and Rosetta 58 model sidechain conformational changes using rotamer libraries, but these approaches cannot guarantee the identification of the lowest energy conformation.”
BackgroundMethodPredicting the impact of Lynch syndrome-causing missense mutations from structural calculations
Nielsen, S. V., Stein, A., Dinitzen, A. B., Papaleo, E., Tatham, M. H., Poulsen, E. G., Kassem, M. M., Rasmussen, L. J., Lindorff‐Larsen, K., & Hartmann‐Petersen, R. (2017) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1006739 · Cited by 101
Hashemi, Z. S., Zarei, M., Fath, M. K., Ganji, M., Farahani, M. S., Afsharnouri, F., Pourzardosht, N., Khalesi, B., Jahangiri, A., Rahbar, M. R., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2021.669431 · Cited by 105
Keskin, Ö., Ma, B., Rogale, K., Gunasekaran, K., & Nussinov, R. (2005) · Physical Biology · doi:10.1088/1478-3975/2/2/s03 · Cited by 101
PupaSNP Finder: a web tool for finding SNPs with putative effect at transcriptional level
Conde, L., Vaquerizas, J. M., Santoyo, J., Al‐Shahrour, F., Ruiz‐Llorente, S., Robledo, M., & Dopazo, J. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkh438 · Cited by 100
Computational Prediction of Protein Hot Spot Residues
Morrow, J. K., & Zhang, S. (2012) · Current Pharmaceutical Design · doi:10.2174/138161212799436412 · Cited by 97
Sukhwal, A., & Sowdhamini, R. (2015) · Bioinformatics and Biology Insights · doi:10.4137/bbi.s25928 · Cited by 96
Stability of domain structures in multi-domain proteins
Bhaskara, R. M., & Srinivasan, N. (2011) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep00040 · Cited by 98
Chen, Y., Ding, F., Nie, H., Serohijos, A. W. R., Sharma, S. K., Wilcox, K. C., Yin, S., & Dokholyan, N. V. (2007) · Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics · doi:10.1016/j.abb.2007.05.014 · Cited by 99
Robust ω-Transaminases by Computational Stabilization of the Subunit Interface
Meng, Q., Capra, N., Palacio, C. M., Lanfranchi, E., Otzen, M., van Schie, L. Z., Rozeboom, H. J., Thunnissen, A. M. W. H., Wijma, H. J., & Janssen, D. B. (2020) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.9b05223 · Cited by 98
Rakoczy, E. P., Kiel, C., McKeone, R., Stricher, F., & Serrano, L. G. (2010) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2010.11.003 · Cited by 101
Self-citationThe bacterial P450 BM3: a prototype for a biocatalyst with human P450 activities
Yun, C., Kim, K., Kim, D., Jung, H.-C., & Pan, J. (2007) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.05.003 · Cited by 97
Matta, C. F., & Bader, R. F. W. (2003) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10414 · Cited by 97
Kunik, V., & Ofran, Y. (2013) · Protein Engineering Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/gzt027 · Cited by 96
“The predicted energetic effect of .1000 mutations were found to have a correlation of 0.83 with the experimental results (Guerois et al., 2002).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialIn Vivo Architectonic Stability of Fully de Novo Designed Protein-Only Nanoparticles
Céspedes, M. V., Unzueta, U., Tatkiewicz, W. I., Sánchez‐Chardi, A., Conchillo‐Solé, O., Álamo, P., Xu, Z., Casanova, I., Corchero, J. L., Pesarrodona, M., et al. (2014) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn4055732 · Cited by 98
Molecular and functional characterization of a novel cardiac-specific human tropomyosin isoform
Rajan, S., Jagatheesan, G., Karam, C. N., Alves, M. L., Bodi, I., Schwartz, A., Bulcao, C. F., D'Souza, K. M., Akhter, S. A., Boivin, G. P., et al. (2010) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.109.889725 · Cited by 92
A resource of variant effect predictions of single nucleotide variants in model organisms
Wagih, O., Busby, B. P., Galardini, M., Memon, D., Typas, A., & Beltrão, P. (2018) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.15252/msb.20188430 · Cited by 97
“The siftr R package (https://github. com/omarwagih/siftr), an implementation of the SIFT algorithm, was used to generate SIFT scores with parameters ic_thresh = 3.25 and residue_thresh = 2.”
InfluentialProtein engineering design from directed evolution to de novo synthesis
Xiong, W., Liu, B., Shen, Y., Jing, K., & Savage, T. (2021) · Biochemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bej.2021.108096 · Cited by 94
Large-scale chemoproteomics expedites ligand discovery and predicts ligand behavior in cells
Offensperger, F., Tin, G., Duran‐Frigola, M., Hahn, E., Dobner, S., Ende, C. W. A., Strohbach, J. W., Rukavina, A., Brennsteiner, V., Ogilvie, K., et al. (2024) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adk5864 · Cited by 102
“Validation experi-mentsincludedcompetitivechemicalpulldownexperimentswithWesternblotanalysis,dock-ingstudies( 58 – 63 ), production ( 64 ) and invitro labeling of recombinant proteins with fragment probes, confocal microscopy to investigate sub-cellular localization of fragments, and functional…”
BackgroundPredictions of Hot Spot Residues at Protein-Protein Interfaces Using Support Vector Machines
Lise, S., Buchan, D. W. A., Pontil, M., & Jones, D. T. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016774 · Cited by 94
Usmanova, D. R., Bogatyreva, N. S., Ariño Bernad, J., Eremina, A. A., Gorshkova, A. A., Kanevskiy, G. M., Lonishin, L. R., Meister, A. V., Yakupova, A. G., Kondrashov, F. A., et al. (2018) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty340 · Cited by 93
Cang, Z., & Wei, G. (2017) · Computer applications in the biosciences · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx460 · Cited by 95
Energy estimation in protein design
Mendes, J., Guérois, R., & Serrano, L. G. (2002) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/s0959-440x(02)00345-7 · Cited by 93
Self-citationMoretti, R., Fleishman, S. J., Agius, R., Torchala, M., Bates, P. A., Kastritis, P. L., Rodrigues, J., Trellet, M. E., Bonvin, A. M. J. J., Cui, M., et al. (2013) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24356 · Cited by 90
Protein-protein interface hot spots prediction based on a hybrid feature selection strategy
Qiao, Y., Xiong, Y., Gao, H., Zhu, X., & Chen, P. (2018) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-018-2009-5 · Cited by 92
“Knowledge-based methods, especially the machine learning based methods [21, 24 – 26], can predict HS with a wide range of features of residues and are more effective than those fully atomic models [14, 15].”
MethodIannaccone, A., Man, D., Waseem, N. H., Jennings, B., Ganapathiraju, M. K., Gallaher, K. T., Reese, E., Bhattacharya, S. S., & Klein‐Seetharaman, J. (2006) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2006.08.018 · Cited by 92
Binding Hot Spots in the TEM1–BLIP Interface in Light of its Modular Architecture
Reichmann, D., Cohen, M., Abramovich, R., Dym, O., Lim, D., Strynadka, N. C. J., & Schreiber, G. (2006) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2006.09.076 · Cited by 92
Predicting and Experimentally Validating Hot-Spot Residues at Protein–Protein Interfaces
Ibarra, A. Á., Bartlett, G. J., Hegedüs, Z., Dutt, S., Hóbor, F., Horner, K. A., Hetherington, K., Spence, K., Nelson, A. S., Edwards, T. A., et al. (2019) · ACS Chemical Biology · doi:10.1021/acschembio.9b00560 · Cited by 90
“44,45 The original Robetta method 54 is a physical energy function parametrized on a monomeric protein data set (Pro-Therm).”
A Detailed Thermodynamic Analysis of Ras/Effector Complex Interfaces
Kiel, C., Serrano, L. G., & Herrmann, C. (2004) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2004.05.050 · Cited by 95
Self-citationLi, G., Fang, X., Su, F., Chen, Y., Xu, L., & Yan, Y. (2017) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02129-17 · Cited by 90
“(ii) Prediction by FoldX.”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Emerging Potential for Network Analysis to Inform Precision Cancer Medicine
Öztürk, K., Dow, M. T., Carlin, D. E., Bejar, R. L., & Carter, H. K. (2018) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2018.06.016 · Cited by 90
Rockah-Shmuel, L., Tóth-Petróczy, Á., & Tawfik, D. S. (2015) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004421 · Cited by 91
“HaeIII ( PDB id 1dct ) [ 103 ] was first optimized using the FoldX RepairPDB function .”
MethodInfluentialFilippo, M. D., Sassolas, A., Peretti, N., ROY, C. C., Deslandres, C., Sinnett, D., Levy, E. H., & Lachaux, A. (2007) · Molecular Genetics and Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2007.08.120 · Cited by 90
Predicting folding free energy changes upon single point mutations
Zhang, Z., Wang, L., Gao, Y., Zhang, J., Zhenirovskyy, M., & Alexov, E. G. (2012) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts005 · Cited by 90
Cagnoli, C., Stévanin, G., Brussino, A., Barberis, M., Mancini, C., Margolis, R. L., Holmes, S. E., Nobili, M., Forlani, S., Padovan, S., et al. (2010) · Human Mutation · doi:10.1002/humu.21342 · Cited by 90
Weetman, D., Wilding, C. S., Neafsey, D. E., Müller, P., Ochomo, E., Isaacs, A. T., Steen, K., Rippon, E. J., Morgan, J. C., Mawejje, H. D., et al. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-21265-5 · Cited by 82
Using AlphaFold to predict the impact of single mutations on protein stability and function
Pak, M. A., Markhieva, K. A., Novikova, M. S., Petrov, D. S., Vorobyev, I. S., Maksimova, E. S., Kondrashov, F. A., & Ivankov, D. N. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.09.19.460937 · Cited by 322
Estimating the prevalence of protein sequences adopting functional enzyme folds
Axe, D. D. (2004) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2004.06.058 · Cited by 86
Fiesel, F. C., Caulfield, T. R., Moussaud-Lamodière, E. L., Ogaki, K., Dourado, D. F. A. R., Flores, S. C., Ross, O. A., & Springer, W. (2015) · Human Mutation · doi:10.1002/humu.22808 · Cited by 89
“Lastly, it calculates the difference in free energies of folding ( G) between the thus-equilibrated wild-type and mutant structures ( G = Gmut– Gwt) using the FoldX potential [Guerois et al., 2002].”
MethodRNA as a key factor in driving or preventing self-assembly of the TAR DNA-binding protein 43
Zacco, E., Graña‐Montes, R., Martin, S. R., de Groot, N. S., Alfano, C., Tartaglia, G. G., & Pastore, A. (2019) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2019.01.028 · Cited by 89
“We used different approaches topredict the effects ofmutations on RNA binding using catRAPID, protein stability through FoldX and protein aggregation with Aggrescan3D. catRAPID uses secondary structure predictions and a potential for the van der Waals and hydrogen bonding contributions.”
MethodInfluentialComputational Library Design for Increasing Haloalkane Dehalogenase Stability
Floor, R. J., Wijma, H. J., Colpa, D. I., Ramos‐Silva, A., Jekel, P. A., Szymański, W., Feringa, B. L., Marrink, . J., & Janssen, D. B. (2014) · ChemBioChem · doi:10.1002/cbic.201402128 · Cited by 89
Potential role of phenotypic mutations in the evolution of protein expression and stability
Goldsmith, M., & Tawfik, D. S. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0809506106 · Cited by 81
Using a structural and logics systems approach to infer bHLH–DNA binding specificity determinants
Masi, F. D., Grove, C. A., Vedenko, A., Alibés, A., Gisselbrecht, S. S., Serrano, L., Bulyk, M. L., & Walhout, A. J. M. (2011) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr070 · Cited by 88
Self-citationMiyake, N., Yano, S., Sakai, C., Hatakeyama, H., Matsushima, Y., Shiina, M., Watanabe, Y., Bartley, J. A., Abdenur, J. E., Wang, R., et al. (2012) · Human Mutation · doi:10.1002/humu.22257 · Cited by 87
Energy functions for protein design I: Efficient and accurate continuum electrostatics and solvation
Pokala, N., & Handel, T. M. (2004) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.03486104 · Cited by 88
HOXB1 Founder Mutation in Humans Recapitulates the Phenotype of Hoxb1 Mice
Webb, B. D., Shaaban, S., Gaspar, H., Cunha, L. F., Schubert, C. R., Hao, K., Robson, C. D., Chan, W. M., Andrews, C. V., MacKinnon, S. E., et al. (2012) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.05.018 · Cited by 88
Sulea, T. I., Rohani, N., Baardsnes, J., Corbeil, C. R., Deprez, C., Donates, Y. C., Robert, A., Schrag, J. D., Parat, M., Duchesne, M., et al. (2019) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2019.1682866 · Cited by 87
Masso, M., & Vaisman, I. I. (2010) · Protein Engineering Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/gzq042 · Cited by 86
Analyzing Protein Interaction Networks Using Structural Information
Kiel, C., Beltrão, P., & Serrano, L. G. (2008) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.062706.133317 · Cited by 85
Self-citationSpassov, V. Z., & Yan, L. (2013) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24230 · Cited by 87
Structure-Based Analysis Reveals Cancer Missense Mutations Target Protein Interaction Interfaces
Engin, H. B., Kreisberg, J. F., & Carter, H. K. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0152929 · Cited by 84
“As recommended in the FoldX tool’s manual, we discarded the free energy changes smaller than 0.5.”
MethodInfluentialAccurate Stabilities of Laccase Mutants Predicted with a Modified FoldX Protocol
Christensen, N. J., & Kepp, K. P. (2012) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci300398z · Cited by 81
Pearce, R., Huang, X., Setiawan, D., & Zhang, Y. (2019) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2019.02.028 · Cited by 83
“…were optimized by minimizing the difference between experimental and predicted values for mutation-induced protein monomer stability change The experimental data consisted of 3,989 non-redundant mutation samples from 210 monomeric proteins taken from the FoldX and STRUM datasets [25, 26].”
MethodConchúir, S. Ó., Barlow, K. A., Pache, R. A., Ollikainen, N., Kundert, K., O’Meara, M. J., Smith, C. A., & Kortemme, T. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0130433 · Cited by 81
“[15]; a set of 2156 mutants collected by Potapov et al.”
BackgroundGeng, C., Vangone, A., Folkers, G. E., Xue, L. C., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2019) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25630 · Cited by 82
“ple energy terms with weights optimized on a set of experimental ΔΔG values.(6) • ZeMu, which can model conformational changes upon mutation”
De novo hotspot variants in CYFIP2 cause early‐onset epileptic encephalopathy
Nakashima, M., Kato, M., Aoto, K., Shiina, M., Belal, H., Mukaida, S., Kumada, S., Sato, A., Zerem, A., Lerman‐Sagie, T., et al. (2018) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.25208 · Cited by 80
“This prediction was supported by the FoldX calculation of free energy change for each mutation (Fig 4E).(34) Tyr151 in WAVE1 is a highly conserved residue located in the meander regions of WAVE1 and is important for WRC activation.”
MethodmmCSM-PPI: predicting the effects of multiple point mutations on protein–protein interactions
Rodrigues, C. H. M., Pires, D. E. V., & Ascher, D. B. (2021) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkab273 · Cited by 83
“Overall, our method has proven to be the most robust when compared with FoldX and Discovery Studio, achieving an AUC and MCC of 0.72 and 0.53, respectively, when evaluated on mutations where | G binding | 1 kcal / mol.”
BackgroundInfluentialEvolving a Polymerase for Hydrophobic Base Analogues
Loakes, D., Gallego, J., Pinheiro, V. B., Kool, E. T., & Holliger, P. (2009) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja9039696 · Cited by 82
Computational and Theoretical Methods for Protein Folding
Compiani, M., & Capriotti, E. (2013) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi4001529 · Cited by 83
Sequence and Structure Signatures of Cancer Mutation Hotspots in Protein Kinases
Dixit, A., Yi, L., Gowthaman, R., Torkamani, A., Schork, N. J., & Verkhivker, G. M. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007485 · Cited by 83
A Computational Library Design Protocol for Rapid Improvement of Protein Stability: FRESCO
Wijma, H. J., Fürst, M. J. L. J., & Janssen, D. B. (2017) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-7366-8_5 · Cited by 80
Pagel, K. A., Antaki, D., Lian, A., Mort, M. E., Cooper, D. N., Sebat, J. L., Iakoucheva, L. M., Mooney, S. D., & Predrag Radivojac, A. (2019) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007112 · Cited by 82
Chen, C., Boorla, V. S., Banerjee, D., Chowdhury, R., Cavener, V. S., Nissly, R. H., Gontu, A., Boyle, N. R., Vandegrift, K. J., Nair, M. S., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2106480118 · Cited by 81
“Some of them use energies directly from molecular mechanics−based empirical force fields such as FoldX (52) and Rosetta (53, 54) or energies from molecular mechanics– generalized Born surface area (MM-GBSA) analysis of ensembles obtained fromMD simulations (55).”
MethodPredicting changes in protein thermostability brought about by single- or multi-site mutations
Tian, J., Wu, N., Chu, X., & Fan, Y. (2010) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-370 · Cited by 80
Investigating the Effects of Mutations on Protein Aggregation in the Cell
Calloni, G., Zoffoli, S., Stefani, M., Dobson, C. M., & Chiti, F. (2004) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m412951200 · Cited by 81
Assi, S. A., Tanaka, T. U., Rabbitts, T. H., & Fernández‐Fuentes, N. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp1158 · Cited by 83
Potential Functions for Hydrogen Bonds in Protein Structure Prediction and Design
Morozov, A. V., & Kortemme, T. (2005) · Advances in protein chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0065-3233(05)72001-5 · Cited by 79
Berliner, N., Teyra, J., Çolak, R., Lopez, S. G., & Kim, P. M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0107353 · Cited by 77
“The second factor is that ProMaya relies on a single DDG prediction value from Prethermut, whereas we provide all independent FoldX energy terms as features in combination with molecular and sequence features.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialHavird, J. C., Whitehill, N. S., Snow, C. D., & Sloan, D. B. (2015) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/evo.12808 · Cited by 79
The PINK1 p.I368N mutation affects protein stability and ubiquitin kinase activity
Ando, M., Fiesel, F. C., Hudec, R., Caulfield, T. R., Ogaki, K., Górka-Skoczylas, P., Koziorowski, D., Friedman, A., Chen, L., Dawson, V. L., et al. (2017) · Molecular Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s13024-017-0174-z · Cited by 80
“Prediction of binding energy changes in proteins using FoldX algorithm For each proposed mutation locus, we equilibrated the corresponding flexibility zone in the wild type complex and evaluated the free energy of unfolding (ΔGwt) with the KB potential FoldX [48].”
MethodInfluentialBulliard, Y., Narvaiza, I., Bertero, A., Peddi, S., Röhrig, U. F., Ortiz, M., Zoete, V., Castro-Díaz, N., Turelli, P., Telenti, A., et al. (2010) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.01651-10 · Cited by 78
Computer‐assisted engineering of hyperstable fibroblast growth factor 2
Dvořák, P., Bednář, D., Vaňáček, P., Bálek, L., Eiselleová, L., Štěpánková, V., Šebestová, E., Bosakova, M. K., Konečná, Ž., Mazurenko, S., et al. (2017) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.26531 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Guerois, R., Nielsen, J. E., & Serrano, L.
- Affiliations
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
- Venue
- Journal of Molecular Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-07
- Volume
- 320
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 369-387
- ISSN
- 0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2092387745
- Cited by
- 1,728
- References
- 95
- Citations by year
- 2026: 68 · 2025: 85 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 90 · 2020: 98 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 90 · 2017: 84 · 2016: 94 · 2015: 93 · 2014: 90 · 2013: 102 · 2012: 87
- FWCI
- 12.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- protein stability prediction, point mutations, protein-protein complex, parameter optimization, protein design, protein folding pathways
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Hydrogen Bonding, Models, Genetic, Mutation, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Software, Thermodynamics, Water, Models, Statistical, Point Mutation, Protein Structure, Secondary, Protein Folding, Databases as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review