Cited by 147Connective tissue disorders researchCellular Mechanics and InteractionsSilk-based biomaterials and applications

Fibrillin Microfibrils are Stiff Reinforcing Fibres in Compliant Tissues

Sherratt, Michael J., Baldock, Clair, Louise Haston, J., Holmes, David F., Jones, Carolyn J.P., Adrian Shuttleworth, C., Wess, Timothy J., Kielty, Cay M.·2003·Journal of Molecular Biology

Abstract

Fibrillin-rich microfibrils have endowed tissues with elasticity throughout multicellular evolution. We have used molecular combing techniques to determine Young's modulus for individual microfibrils and X-ray diffraction of zonular filaments of the eye to establish the linearity of microfibril periodic extension. Microfibril periodicity is not altered at physiological zonular tissue extensions and Young's modulus is between 78 MPa and 96 MPa, which is two orders of magnitude stiffer than elastin. We conclude that elasticity in microfibril-containing tissues arises primarily from reversible alterations in supra-microfibrillar arrangements rather than from intrinsic elastic properties of individual microfibrils which, instead, act as reinforcing fibres in fibrous composite tissues.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-2836(03)00829-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fibrillin microfibrils can extend but are not intrinsically elastic, and their Young's modulus is two orders of magnitude higher than that of elastin.

    “However, although they can extend, they are not intrinsically elastic and their Young’s modulus is two orders of magnitude higher than that of elastin [38].”
  • The connecting fibrillin microfibrils in the central cornea are less extensible.

    “The connecting fibrillin microfibrils in the central cornea are less extensible”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sherratt, M. J., Baldock, C., Louise Haston, J., Holmes, D. F., Jones, C. J. P., Adrian Shuttleworth, C., Wess, T. J., & Kielty, C. M.
Affiliations
  • Wellcome Centre for Cell-Matrix Research (GB)
  • St Mary's Hospital (GB)
  • University of Stirling (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
Venue
Journal of Molecular Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-09
Volume
332
Issue
1
Pages
183-193
ISSN
0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2128199042
Cited by
147
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Silk-based biomaterials and applications
Keywords
Young's modulus, tissue stiffness, zonule, molecular combing, elastin, reinforcing fibers
MeSH terms
Fibrillins, Aged, Animals, Cattle, Deer, Elasticity, Elastin, Eye Proteins, Humans, Microfilament Proteins, Models, Molecular, Stress, Mechanical, X-Ray Diffraction, Extracellular Matrix Proteins, Microscopy, Atomic Force, Cryoelectron Microscopy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review