Cited by 22

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The procurement of obsidian: factors influencing the choice of deposits

Barge, O., Chataigner, C.·2003·Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-3093(03)00301-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The topographically enclosed character of Laguna del Diamante may have produced a nearly exclusive exploitation pattern.

    “The topographically enclosed character of Laguna del Diamante may have produced a nearly exclusive exploitation pattern (Barge and Chataigner, 2003).”
  • The presence of societies with herding strategies opens the possibility to explore transhumant routes that are usually accompanied by reduced quantity of obsidian in disseminated sites far from the source.

    “The presence of societies with herding strategies opens the possibility to explore the existence of transhumant routes that usually are accompanied by reduced quantity of obsidian in disseminated sites in long distances from the source (Barge and Chataigner, 2003) like the pattern recorded in the latter period.”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Badalian, 2001, Radiat. Meas., 34, 10.1016/S1350-4487(01)00189-5 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Barge, O., & Chataigner, C.
Venue
Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-08
Volume
323
Issue
1-3
Pages
172-179
ISSN
0022-3093
Cited by
22
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review