The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Breast-feeding and health in the 1980s: A global epidemiologic review
Open accessAbstract
In view of the significant and articulate minority view among pediatricians that breast feeding is not "worth the bother" in developed countries, this review of the literature delves into the evidence from both developed and developing countries for the advantages of breastfeeding, both in infants and for long-term health. Infants in developed settings experience twice the hospitalization rate and more severe illness from lower respiratory tract infection, primarily respiratory syncytial virus. In developing countries the mortality risk is 4-fold. for otitis media, the relative risks were 3.3-4.3 for Finnish infants. Bacterial meningitis and/or bacteremia had a 4-fold risk for hospitalization in a Connecticut study, and a 3-fold relative risk in 2 developing country studies. Human milk was the best preventative for bacteremia and necrotizing enterocolitis in prematures in British neonatal units. A 20-fold reduction in neonatal deaths occurred in Philippine study of breastfeeding, especially in low birth weight babies. Diarrhea causes the most infant mortality in developing nations, where bottle-feeding raises rates 14-fold. In the U.S. estimated relative risks is 3.7 for diarrheal mortality. Sudden infant death is about 1/5 less common in U.S. breast fed babies than in bottle fed. There is evidence for better long-term health after breast feeding in disorders such as celiac disease, Crohn disease, ulcerative colitis, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, thyroid disease, malignant lymphoma, chronic liver disease, atopic dermatitis, and food allergies. The design of good studies of protection conferred by breast feeding, and the possible modes of action of breast milk are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reduced risk of IDDM among breast-fed children. The Colorado IDDM Registry
Mayer, E. J., Hamman, R. F., Gay, E. C., Lezotte, D. C., Savitz, D. A., & Klingensmith, G. J. (1988) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/diab.37.12.1625 · Cited by 169
Cited by
Drug Therapy for Breast-Feeding Women
Ito, S. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200007133430208 · Cited by 320
Cesarean childbirth and psychosocial outcomes: A meta-analysis.
DiMatteo, M. R., Morton, S. C., Lepper, H. S., Damush, T. M., Carney, M. F., Pearson, M., & Kahn, K. L. (1996) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.15.4.303 · Cited by 247
Breast-Feeding and Postpartum Depression: Is There a Relationship?
Misri, S., Sinclair, D. A., & Kuan, A. J. (1997) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/070674379704201007 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Cunningham, A. S., Jelliffe, D. B., & Patrice Jelliffe, E. F.
- Venue
- The Journal of Pediatrics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1991-05
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 659-666
- ISSN
- 0022-3476 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2168724234
- Cited by
- 428
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Breast-feeding and health in the 1980s: A global epidemiologic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-3476(05)80023-x
- The paper
- Cunningham, A. S., Jelliffe, D. B., & Patrice Jelliffe, E. F. (1991). Breast-feeding and health in the 1980s: A global epidemiologic review. The Journal of Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3476(05)80023-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.