Reduced risk of IDDM among breast-fed children. The Colorado IDDM Registry
Abstract
The hypothesis that breast-feeding can provide protection against the development of insulindependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) and would, therefore, be less common among subjects with IDDM was tested with a retrospective design. Cases (n = 268) were selected from the Colorado IDDM Registry and the Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes (Denver, CO). Two control groups were recruited, one from physicians' practices throughout Colorado (n = 291) and the second through random-digit dialing from the Denver area (n = 188). Cases were less likely to have been breast-fed than controls after adjustment for birth year, maternal age, maternal education, family income, race, and sex [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 0.70; 95% confidence interval (Cl) = 0.50–0.97]. This finding was consistent for both control groups and by birth-year intervals. A greater decrease in risk of IDDM was seen among subjects who had been breast-fed to an older age (for breast-feeding duration of ≥12 mo, adjusted OR = 0.54, 95% Cl = 0.27–1.08). The amount of IDDM that might be explained by breast-feeding habits (population percentage attributable risk) ranged from 2 to 26%, varying according to the breast-feeding prevalence reported in other studies. Replication of this work in different populations, controlled for the strong secular trends in breast-feeding habits, is critical before the hypothesis of protection is accepted.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Evidence on whether early introduction of cow's milk or protective effects of breast milk contribute to childhood type 1 diabetes is equivocal and may depend on genetic susceptibility.
“Evidence regarding early introduction of cow’s milk (or protective effects of breast milk consumption) in infants contributing to the development of childhood T1D is equivocal73–76 and may depend on genetic susceptibility77.”
From Epidemiology of type 1 diabetes (2010) · cites this paper as [75]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Epidemiology of type 1 diabetes
Maahs, D. M., West, N. A., Lawrence, J. M., & Mayer-Davis, E. J. (2010) · Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.ecl.2010.05.011 · Cited by 1,092 · see citing works
Le Huërou-Luron, I., Blat, S., & Boudry, G. (2010) · Nutrition Research Reviews · doi:10.1017/s0954422410000065 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
Garrido, D., Dallas, D. C., & Mills, D. A. (2013) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/mic.0.064113-0 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Nutritional risk predictors of β cell autoimmunity and type 1 diabetes at a young age
Virtanen, S. M., & Knip, M. (2003) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/78.6.1053 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Nutritionally Mediated Programming of the Developing Immune System
Palmer, A. C. (2011) · Advances in Nutrition · doi:10.3945/an.111.000570 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Pereira, P. F., Alfenas, R. D. C. G., & Araújo, R. M. A. (2014) · Jornal de Pediatria · doi:10.1016/j.jped.2013.02.024 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
The aetiology of type 1 diabetes: an epidemiological perspective
Dahlquist, G. (1998) · Acta Paediatrica · doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.1998.tb01244.x · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Cow's milk and type 1 childhood diabetes: no increase in risk
Bodington, M. J., McNally, P. G., & Burden, A. C. (1994) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.1994.tb00329.x · Cited by 40 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mayer, E. J., Hamman, R. F., Gay, E. C., Lezotte, D. C., Savitz, D. A., & Klingensmith, G. J.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Venue
- Diabetes
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 1988-12-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1625-1632
- ISSN
- 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-327X
- OpenAlex
- W2006426218
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diabetes (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01am030747-03)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
- Keywords
- breastfeeding, type 1 diabetes, pediatric diabetes, diabetes risk factors, breastfeeding duration, population attributable risk
- MeSH terms
- Breast Feeding, Colorado, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Milk, Human, Registries, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review