Cited by 96Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth FactorsPituitary Gland Disorders and TreatmentsHypothalamic control of reproductive hormones

Evaluation of growth hormone release and human growth hormone treatment in children with cranial irradiation-associated short stature

Romshe, Carolyn A., Zipf, William B., Miser, Angela, Miser, James, Sotos, Juan F., Newton, William A.·1984·The Journal of Pediatrics

Abstract

We studied nine children who had received cranial irradiation for various malignancies and subsequently experienced decreased growth velocity. Their response to standard growth hormone stimulation and release tests were compared with that in seven children with classic GH deficiency and in 24 short normal control subjects. With arginine and L-dopa stimulation, six of nine patients who received radiation had a normal GH response (greater than 7 ng/ml), whereas by design none of the GH deficient and all of the normal children had a positive response. Only two of nine patients had a normal response to insulin hypoglycemia, with no significant differences in the mean maximal response of the radiation and the GH-deficient groups. Pulsatile secretion was not significantly different in the radiation and GH-deficient groups, but was different in the radiation and normal groups. All subjects in the GH-deficient and radiation groups were given human growth hormone for 1 year. Growth velocity increased in all, with no significant difference in the response of the two groups when comparing the z scores for growth velocity of each subject's bone age. We recommend a 6-month trial of hGH in children who have had cranial radiation and are in prolonged remission with a decreased growth velocity, as there is no completely reliable combination of GH stimulation or release tests to determine their response.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-3476(84)80988-9

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GH stimulation tests identify children and adults who have clear-cut GHD but may miss persons with partial GHD.

    “GH stimulation tests identify children and adults who have clear–cut GHD but may miss persons with partial GHD [53].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Romshe, C. A., Zipf, W. B., Miser, A., Miser, J., Sotos, J. F., & Newton, W. A.
Corresponding author
Romshe, Carolyn A.
Venue
The Journal of Pediatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1984-02
Volume
104
Issue
2
Pages
177-181
ISSN
0022-3476 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2056309567
Cited by
96
References
24
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2015: 3
FWCI
7.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
Keywords
cranial irradiation, short stature, growth hormone therapy, growth hormone deficiency, growth hormone stimulation test, pulsatile growth hormone secretion, arginine stimulation, growth rate, childhood cancer survivors, bone age
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Brain, Brain Neoplasms, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Growth Disorders, Humans, Leukemia, Lymphoid, Male, Radiation Injuries, Growth Hormone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review