Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 533

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Expression of P-glycoprotein in Human Placenta: Relation to Genetic Polymorphism of the Multidrug Resistance (MDR)-1 Gene

Tanabe, Mizuho, Ieiri, Ichiro, Nagata, Naoki, Inoue, Kazuko, Ito, Soichiro, Kanamori, Yasunobu, Takahashi, Masakuni, Kurata, Yasuo, Kigawa, Junzo, Higuchi, Shun, Terakawa, Naoki, Otsubo, Kenji·2001·The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Abstract

To evaluate whether mutations in the human multidrug resistance (MDR)-1 gene correlate with placental P-glycoprotein (PGP) expression, we sequenced the MDR-1 cDNA and measured PGP expression by Western blotting in 100 placentas obtained from Japanese women. Nine single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were observed with an allelic frequency of 0.005 to 0.420. Of these SNPs, G2677A (allelic frequency = 0.18) and G2677T (0.39) in exon 21 were associated with an amino acid conversion from Ala to Thr and to Ser, respectively. Sixty-one of 65 samples (93.8%), which had a C3435T allele, also had a mutant G2677(A,T) allele, suggesting an association between the two SNPs. Correlations of mutations with expression levels were observed; individuals having the G2677(A,T) and/or T-129C (p < 0.05) allele had less placental PGP. Polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP)-based genotyping tests were developed for the detection of these SNPs. The PCR, in which genomic DNAs obtained from healthy subjects (n = 48) are used as samples, was successful. The frequency of mutations in placental cDNA was identical with that in genomic DNA. When genotype results were compared between Caucasians and Japanese, ethnic differences in the frequency of polymorphism in the MDR-1 gene were suspected. Although it remains to be determined whether these SNPs influence the pharmacokinetic and dynamic properties of clinically useful drugs that are substrates of PGP, the polymorphism of the MDR-1 gene presented here may provide useful information in in vivo study of these issues.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-3565(24)29643-9

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Tanabe, M., Ieiri, I., Nagata, N., Inoue, K., Ito, S., Kanamori, Y., Takahashi, M., Kurata, Y., Kigawa, J., Higuchi, S., Terakawa, N., & Otsubo, K.
Venue
The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-06
Volume
297
Issue
3
Pages
1137-1143
ISSN
0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2109083028
Cited by
533
References
0
FWCI
15.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.