Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 196

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluation of Effect of Charge and Lipid Coating on Ability of 60-nm Nanoparticles to Cross an In Vitro Model of the Blood-Brain Barrier

Fenart, L., Casanova, A., Dehouck, B., Duhem, C., Slupek, S., Cecchelli, R., Betbeder, D.·1999·The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Abstract

A cell culture model of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) consisting of a coculture of bovine brain capillary endothelial cells and rat astrocytes has been used to examine the ability of 60-nm nanoparticles with different physicochemical characteristics to cross the BBB. Neutral, anionic, and cationic nanoparticles were made from crosslinked malto-dextrins derivatized or not (neutral) with phosphates (anionic), quaternary ammoniums (cationic) ligands. Then, these particles were coated or not with a lipid bilayer made of dipalmitoyl phosphatidyl choline and cholesterol. Lipid coating of ionically charged nanoparticles was able to increase BBB crossing 3- or 4-fold compared with uncoated particles, whereas coating of neutral particles did not significantly alter their permeation characteristics across the endothelial cell monolayer. Lipid-coated nanoparticles were nontoxic toward BBB integrity, and crossed the BBB by transcytosis without any degradation. Furthermore, a 27-fold increase in albumin transport was observed when albumin had previously been loaded in the cationic lipid-coated nanoparticles. The influence of red blood cells was studied; a marked inhibition of the transport was observed, probably due to strong interaction between nanoparticles and red blood cells.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-3565(24)35204-8

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 196

Metadata

Authors
Fenart, L., Casanova, A., Dehouck, B., Duhem, C., Slupek, S., Cecchelli, R., & Betbeder, D.
Venue
The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-12
Volume
291
Issue
3
Pages
1017-1022
ISSN
0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2122218978
Cited by
196
References
1
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of Effect of Charge and Lipid Coating on Ability of 60-nm Nanoparticles to Cross an In Vitro Model of the Blood-Brain Barrier. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-3565(24)35204-8
The paper
Fenart, L., Casanova, A., Dehouck, B., Duhem, C., Slupek, S., Cecchelli, R., & Betbeder, D. (1999). Evaluation of Effect of Charge and Lipid Coating on Ability of 60-nm Nanoparticles to Cross an In Vitro Model of the Blood-Brain Barrier. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3565(24)35204-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.