Cited by 11Receptor Mechanisms and SignalingAsthma and respiratory diseasesNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

β-Adrenergic Relaxation of Rabbit Tracheal Smooth Muscle: A Receptor Deficit That Improves with Corticosteroid Administration

Schramm, Craig M.·2000·The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-3565(24)35288-7

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schramm, C. M.
Corresponding author
Schramm, Craig M.
Venue
The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-02
Volume
292
Issue
1
Pages
280-287
ISSN
0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406066099
Cited by
11
References
36
Citations by year
2014: 1
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
beta-adrenergic receptors, tracheal smooth muscle, airway relaxation, corticosteroids, airway hyperresponsiveness, rabbits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review