The DOI matches its Crossref record.
In Vitro Substrate Identification Studies for P-glycoprotein-Mediated Transport: Species Difference and Predictability of in Vivo Results
Abstract
Two different cellular assay models were assessed as in vitro systems for P-glycoprotein (P-gp) substrate identification: cellular accumulation studies with KB-V1, a human MDR1 P-gp-overexpressing multidrug-resistant human epidermoid carcinoma cell line; and transcellular transport studies with L-MDR1 (or L-mdr1a), a human MDR1 (or mouse mdr1a)-transfected porcine renal epithelial cell line. The in vitro-in vivo correlation for P-gp-mediated transport activity was also examined by comparing in vitro data obtained from L-mdr1a cell studies and in vivo data from mdr1a (-/-)/(+/+) CF-1 mice studies for several compounds. The results are summarized as follows: 1) two in vitro assay systems routinely identified the substrate for human MDR1 P-gp-mediated transport with similar quantitative results; 2) in vitro studies with L-MDR1 and L-mdr1a cells demonstrated that the P-gp substrate susceptibility is different between human and mouse for certain compounds (species difference); and 3) in vivo brain concentration ratios of mdr1a (-/-) to (+/+) CF-1 mice, either at a certain time point or up to 60 min, correlated well with the in vitro transcellular transport ratios from L-mdr1a cells (r(2) = 0.968 and 0.926, respectively). This indicates that, at least in mice, the in vitro data are valid predictors of the in vivo contribution of P-gp: the contribution of P-gp to the distribution of the compound to the brain up to 60 min post i.v. administration. These results provide a rationale for predicting in vivo relevance of P-gp in human from in vitro data using human P-gp-expressing cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Targeting multidrug resistance in cancer
Szakács, G., Paterson, J. K., Ludwig, J. A., Booth-Genthe, C., & Gottesman, M. M. (2006) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1984 · Cited by 3,609
Membrane transporters in drug development
The International Transporter Consortium, Giacomini, K. M., Huang, S.-M., Tweedie, D. J., Benet, L. Z., Brouwer, K. L. R., Chu, X., Dahlin, A., Evers, R., Fischer, V., et al. (2010) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3028 · Cited by 3,340
Impact of Drug Transporter Studies on Drug Discovery and Development
Mizuno, N., Niwa, T., Yotsumoto, Y., & Sugiyama, Y. (2003) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.55.3.1 · Cited by 490
Ohtsuki, S., & Terasaki, T. (2007) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1007/s11095-007-9374-5 · Cited by 454
ABC transporters as mediators of drug resistance and contributors to cancer cell biology
Fletcher, J. I., Williams, R. T., Henderson, M. J., Norris, M. D., & Haber, M. (2016) · Drug Resistance Updates · doi:10.1016/j.drup.2016.03.001 · Cited by 423
Metadata
- Authors
- Yamazaki, M., Neway, W. E., Ohe, T., Chen, I.-W., Rowe, J. F., Hochman, J. H., Chiba, M., & Lin, J. H.
- Venue
- The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 296
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 723-735
- ISSN
- 0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2129233012
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Vitro Substrate Identification Studies for P-glycoprotein-Mediated Transport: Species Difference and Predictability of in Vivo Results. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-3565(24)38809-3
- The paper
- Yamazaki, M., Neway, W. E., Ohe, T., Chen, I.-W., Rowe, J. F., Hochman, J. H., Chiba, M., & Lin, J. H. (2001). In Vitro Substrate Identification Studies for P-glycoprotein-Mediated Transport: Species Difference and Predictability of in Vivo Results. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3565(24)38809-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.