Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 261

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Sensitization to the conditioned rewarding effects of cocaine: pharmacological and temporal characteristics.

Shippenberg, T S, Heidbreder, C·1995·The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Abstract

An unbiased place preference conditioning procedure was used to determine whether the repeated administration of cocaine results in sensitization to its conditioned rewarding effects. Rats received noncontingent injections of saline or cocaine (10 mg/kg i.p.) for 5 days. Place preference conditioning commenced 72 hr later. A minimum of three drug conditioning sessions was necessary for the establishment of cocaine-induced conditioned place preferences (CPP) in saline-pretreated rats. The minimum dose producing this effect was 10.0 mg/kg. In contrast, pre-exposure to cocaine resulted in significant place preferences occurring after only two drug conditioning sessions. Furthermore, CPP was observed in response to doses as low as 5.0 mg/kg. This shift in the cocaine dose-response curve was apparent when conditioning commenced either 3 or 7, but not 14, days after the cessation of cocaine pretreatment. An increased sensitivity to cocaine was also observed in rats which received only two cocaine (25.0 mg/kg) injections before conditioning and in those which had received either d-amphetamine (0.5 mg/kg) or morphine (5.0 mg/kg) for 5 days. Repeated administration of the D1 dopamine (DA) receptor antagonist, SCH-23390 (0.01-0.05 mg/kg), or the D2 antagonist, raclopride (0.1-1.0 mg/kg), for 5 days did not modify cocaine-induced place conditioning. Administration of SCH-23390 (0.05 mg/kg) in combination with cocaine, however, prevented the sensitized response to cocaine. In contrast, raclopride did not influence the sensitized response to cocaine. These data demonstrate that sensitization occurs to the conditioned rewarding effects of cocaine and suggest an involvement of D1 DA receptors in the development of this phenomenon.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-3565(25)09578-3

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Shippenberg, T. S., & Heidbreder, C.
Venue
The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-05
Volume
273
Issue
2
Pages
808-815
ISSN
0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2275219801
Cited by
261
References
0
FWCI
3.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sensitization to the conditioned rewarding effects of cocaine: pharmacological and temporal characteristics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)09578-3
The paper
Shippenberg, T. S., & Heidbreder, C. (1995). Sensitization to the conditioned rewarding effects of cocaine: pharmacological and temporal characteristics. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)09578-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.