The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Serotonin and norepinephrine uptake inhibiting activity of centrally acting analgesics: structural determinants and role in antinociception.
Open accessAbstract
Although it is well established that the analgesic effects of morphine are mediated by opioid receptors, previous studies have shown that some opioids additionally inhibit the uptake of serotonin and norepinephrine. The present investigation of a diverse group of opioids revealed that structurally identifiable subgroups inhibited the neuronal reuptake of these monoamines. Phenanthrene opioids with an oxygen bridge between C4 and C5, such as morphine and naloxone (group I), did not block norepinephrine or serotonin uptake, whereas phenanthrene opioids without the oxygen bridge and the C6-OH moiety, such as levorphanol and levomethorphan (group II), did inhibit uptake, as did nonphenanthrene opioids, such as d-propoxyphene and methadone (group III). Affinity at the mu opioid receptor correlated with antinociceptive potency (r = 0.87, P < .05). Although the antinociceptive activity of the "active enantiomers" of group II and III compounds also correlated with their affinity at the mu opioid receptor (r = 0.85, P = .007), additional consideration of serotonin uptake inhibiting activity (but not of norepinephrine uptake inhibiting activity) significantly improved the correlation between antinociceptive potency and the in vitro activity of these compounds (r = 0.915, P = .0017). Additionally, for group II and III (but not group I) compounds, smaller differences between enantiomers in antinociceptive potency than in mu receptor affinity were noted, presumably because of the contribution of uptake inhibition to the antinociceptive activity of group II and III compounds. Evidence also is provided suggesting a broader role for the combination of mu opioid affinity and 5-hydroxytryptamine uptake inhibition in the activity of other antinociceptive agents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Eap, C. B., Buclin, T., & Baumann, P. (2002) · Clinical Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.2165/00003088-200241140-00003 · Cited by 599
Opioids versus antidepressants in postherpetic neuralgia: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial
Raja, S. N., Haythornthwaite, J. A., Pappagallo, M., Clark, M. R., Travison, T. G., Sabeen, S., Royall, R. M., & Max, M. B. (2002) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.59.7.1015 · Cited by 593
Attenuation of Antidepressant Effects of Ketamine by Opioid Receptor Antagonism
Williams, N. R., Heifets, B. D., Blasey, C., Sudheimer, K., Pannu, J., Pankow, H., Hawkins, J., Birnbaum, J., Lyons, D. M., Rodriguez, C. I., et al. (2018) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.18020138 · Cited by 519
MOHAMMAD‐ZADEH, L. F., MOSES, L., & GWALTNEY‐BRANT, S. M. (2008) · Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2885.2008.00944.x · Cited by 522
Designer drugs: mechanism of action and adverse effects
Luethi, D., & Liechti, M. E. (2020) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-020-02693-7 · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Codd, E. E., Shank, R. P., Schupsky, J. J., & Raffa, R. B.
- Venue
- The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-09
- Volume
- 274
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1263-1270
- ISSN
- 0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2102247119
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Serotonin and norepinephrine uptake inhibiting activity of centrally acting analgesics: structural determinants and role in antinociception. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)10630-7
- The paper
- Codd, E. E., Shank, R. P., Schupsky, J. J., & Raffa, R. B. (1995). Serotonin and norepinephrine uptake inhibiting activity of centrally acting analgesics: structural determinants and role in antinociception. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)10630-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.