The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Antagonism by antimuscarinic and neuroleptic compounds at the five cloned human muscarinic cholinergic receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells.
Open accessAbstract
We determined the affinity and selectivity of binding for 24 compounds: nine antimuscarinics (including some antiparkinson drugs) and 15 neuroleptics (including the atypical compounds clozapine, fluperlapine, melperone, rilapine, risperidone, tenilapine, tiosperone and zotepine) at the five human muscarinic receptor subtypes expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Equilibrium dissociation constants (Kd) were obtained from competitive radioligand binding studies with [3H]quinuclidinyl benzilate and membranal preparations of these cells. As expected, QNB had the highest affinity of the compounds studied at the five receptor subtypes and was not selective (Kd ranged from 0.027-0.088 nM). Benztropine had the next highest affinity of the antimuscarinic compounds and thioridazine had the highest affinity of the neuroleptics. Among the antiparkinson drugs, biperiden was the only one selective for the m1 subtype; and among the neuroleptics, the atypical drug clozapine was also selective for the m1 subtype. This selectivity may explain clozapine's unusual efficacy in refractory schizophrenic patients and its low incidence of extrapyramidal side effects. However, because most other atypical neuroleptics studied lacked high affinity and selectivity at muscarinic receptor subtypes, it is likely that other mechanisms are involved as well.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Glutamate receptor dysfunction and schizophrenia
Olney, J. W. (1995) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1995.03950240016004 · Cited by 1,685
Binding of antidepressants to human brain receptors: focus on newer generation compounds
Cusack, B., Nelson, A., & Richelson, E. (1994) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf02244985 · Cited by 349
Self-citationFirst-in-Human Assessment of 11C-LSN3172176, an M1 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor PET Radiotracer
Naganawa, M., Nabulsi, N., Henry, S., Matuskey, D., Lin, S.-F., Slieker, L., Schwarz, A. J., Kant, N., Jesudason, C., Ruley, K., et al. (2021) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.120.246967 · Cited by 94
Miller, A. D., & Blaha, C. D. (2005) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04017.x · Cited by 93
Tacrines for Alzheimer's disease therapy. III. The PyridoTacrines
de los Ríos, C., & Marco-Contelles, J. (2019) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.02.005 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Bolden, C., Cusack, B., & Richelson, E.
- Venue
- The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1992-02
- Volume
- 260
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 576-580
- ISSN
- 0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1958815412
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antagonism by antimuscarinic and neuroleptic compounds at the five cloned human muscarinic cholinergic receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)11335-9
- The paper
- Bolden, C., Cusack, B., & Richelson, E. (1992). Antagonism by antimuscarinic and neuroleptic compounds at the five cloned human muscarinic cholinergic receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)11335-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.