Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 275

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of in vitro and in vivo models of drug transcytosis through the blood-brain barrier.

Pardridge, W M, Triguero, D, Yang, J, Cancilla, P A·1990·The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Abstract

Drug and solute transport through in vitro and in vivo models of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) were compared to provide a measure of how well the in vitro model predicted BBB permeability found in vivo. The in vitro model employed bovine brain capillary endothelial cells in either primary tissue culture or as a continuous line grown on Transwells and placed in side-by-side diffusion chambers. The in vivo model of BBB transport utilized an internal carotid artery perfusion/capillary depletion method in anesthetized rats. BBB permeability in vivo and in vitro was measured for 15 radiolabeled drugs and for L-[3H]dopa, D-[14C]glucose and [3H]albumin. [3H]- or [14C]sucrose was used in vivo as a blood volume reference. Lipid solubility of each drug was measured based on the 1-octanol/Ringer's partition coefficient. The morphology of the endothelial cell in primary tissue culture was spindle-shaped and the morphology of the endothelial cell in continuous culture was cuboid-shaped. The cuboidal morphology demonstrated a 2-fold greater resistance to solute transport and was used for the majority of the in vitro studies. Drug and solute permeability coefficients (Pe) ranged from 3.9 X 10(-3) to 2.5 X 10(-1) cm/min in vitro and from 1.0 X 10(-5) to 2.1 X 10(-2) cm/min in vivo. The In of the permeability.surface area product in vitro correlated with the In partition coefficient (r = 0.62, P less than .0125) and the In permeability.surface area product in vivo correlated with the In partition coefficient (r = 0.84, P less than .0005).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-3565(25)13060-7

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Cited by

See all 275

Metadata

Authors
Pardridge, W. M., Triguero, D., Yang, J., & Cancilla, P. A.
Venue
The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1990-05
Volume
253
Issue
2
Pages
884-891
ISSN
0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1896856524
Cited by
275
References
19
FWCI
5.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of in vitro and in vivo models of drug transcytosis through the blood-brain barrier. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)13060-7
The paper
Pardridge, W. M., Triguero, D., Yang, J., & Cancilla, P. A. (1990). Comparison of in vitro and in vivo models of drug transcytosis through the blood-brain barrier. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)13060-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.