The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Investigation of the effects of opiate antagonists infused into the nucleus accumbens on feeding and sucrose drinking in rats.
Abstract
Previous work has shown that opiate agonist infusion into the nucleus accumbens, a region implicated in reinforcement, stimulates food intake. In the present study, the effects of opiate antagonist infusion into this region were examined in two behavioral paradigms. In the feeding test, food-deprived animals were tested for intake of laboratory chow. In the sucrose intake test, sated animals familiar with a 20% sucrose solution were tested. Before these tests, the following drugs were bilaterally infused into the accumbens: naloxone (0, 1, 10 and 30 micrograms; equivalent to 2.8, 28 and 83 nmol, respectively), naltrexone (0, 0.2, 2 and 20 micrograms; 0.55, 5.5 and 55 nmol, respectively), beta-funaltrexamine (0 and 15 micrograms; 31 nmol), naloxonazine (0 and 10 micrograms; 15 nmol), naltrindole (trial 1: 0, 1, 10 and 20 micrograms; 2.2, 22 and 44 nmol, respectively; trial 2: 0, 0.1 and 0.5 micrograms; 0.22 and 1.1 nmol, respectively) and nor-binaltorphimine (0, 0.1, 1 and 10 micrograms; 0.14, 1.4 and 14 nmol, respectively). Naloxone and naltrexone both significantly reduced sucrose drinking and did not affect feeding. Naloxone infused into the dorsolateral striatum, as a control, had no effect on sucrose drinking. Accumbens infusion of the mu antagonist beta-funaltrexamine reduced both sucrose drinking and feeding. The mu 1 antagonist naloxonazine did not influence intake behaviors, with the exception of a decrease in duration of chow feeding. In contrast, the delta antagonist naltrindole markedly potentiated both sucrose drinking and duration of chow feeding. In a replication of this effect, systemic naltrexone given concurrently blocked the enhancement. The kappa antagonist nor-binaltorphimine did not influence any parameters of ingestive behavior. Although some treatments also decreased motor activities, the overall profile of behavior suggested specific effects on ingestive behavior. The putative contributions of mu and delta receptors within the nucleus accumbens to modulation of food reward are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience?
Berridge, K. C., & Robinson, T. E. (1998) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(98)00019-8 · Cited by 4,127
Saper, C. B., Chou, T. C., & Elmquist, J. K. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00969-8 · Cited by 1,120
depue, R. A., & morrone-strupinsky, J. V. (2005) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x05000063 · Cited by 958
Reward, Motivation, and Reinforcement Learning
Dayan, P., & Balleine, B. W. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00963-7 · Cited by 855
Reward mechanisms in obesity: new insights and future directions
Kenny, P. J. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.02.016 · Cited by 748
Metadata
- Authors
- Kelley, A. E., Bless, E. P., & Swanson, C. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-09
- Volume
- 278
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1499-1507
- ISSN
- 0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1904612153
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Investigation of the effects of opiate antagonists infused into the nucleus accumbens on feeding and sucrose drinking in rats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)20805-9
- The paper
- Kelley, A. E., Bless, E. P., & Swanson, C. J. (1996). Investigation of the effects of opiate antagonists infused into the nucleus accumbens on feeding and sucrose drinking in rats. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)20805-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.