The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pharmacodynamic model of tolerance: application to nicotine.
Abstract
The authors propose a model of pharmacodynamic response that, when integrated with a pharmacokinetic model, allows characterization of the development of functional tolerance. The model may be conceived of in several equivalent ways; one of these sees tolerance as a result of (noncompetitive) antagonism of agonist effect by a hypothetical substance (e.g., metabolite) produced by a first-order process, driven by agonist concentration. Tolerance thus lags behind, and is approximately proportional to, agonist concentrations. Two new parameters quantifying tolerance are introduced: kantO, which describes the elimination kinetics of the antagonist and determines the rate of development and disappearance of tolerance, and Cant50, which determines the magnitude of tolerance that can be achieved. The model was tested in eight volunteers on data produced after three sequences of paired i.v. administrations of nicotine separated by different intervals of time. Blood concentrations of nicotine and heart rate were measured. The proposed tolerance model was fitted to the nicotine data. The estimate of kantO suggests a half-life of development and regression of tolerance of 35 min, and the estimate of Cant50 suggests that tolerance, at its full development, causes an approximately 80% reduction of initial (nontolerant) effect. This model provides a quantitative pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic description of the development of acute tolerance that also carries physiologic meaning. The quantitative information provided by this model may improve understanding of the temporal patterns of drug abuse and complications thereof.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A cognitive model of drug urges and drug-use behavior: role of automatic and nonautomatic processes
Tiffany, S. T. (1990) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.97.2.147 · Cited by 1,554
Swanson, J., Gupta, S., Guinta, D., Flynn, D., Agler, D., Lerner, M., Williams, L., Shoulson, I., & Wigal, S. (1999) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/s0009-9236(99)70038-x · Cited by 216
Potter, A., Corwin, J., Lang, J., Piasecki, M., Lenox, R., & Newhouse, P. A. (1999) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s002130050897 · Cited by 163
Changes in craving for a cigarette and arterial nicotine plasma concentrations in abstinent smokers
Guthrie, S. K., Ni, L., Zubieta, J.-K., Teter, C. J., & Domino, E. F. (2004) · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2004.01.005 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Porchet, H. C., Benowitz, N. L., & Sheiner, L. B.
- Venue
- The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1988-01
- Volume
- 244
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 231-236
- ISSN
- 0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1945643167
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pharmacodynamic model of tolerance: application to nicotine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)24269-0
- The paper
- Porchet, H. C., Benowitz, N. L., & Sheiner, L. B. (1988). Pharmacodynamic model of tolerance: application to nicotine. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)24269-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.