Cited by 163Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases

Acute effects of the selective cholinergic channel activator (nicotinic agonist) ABT-418 in Alzheimer's disease

Potter, Alexandra, Corwin, June, Lang, Jason, Piasecki, Melissa, Lenox, Robert, Newhouse, P. A.·1999·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

To explore further the potential for cognitive enhancement utilizing nicotinic stimulation in Alzheimer's disease (AD), six otherwise healthy subjects with moderate AD received placebo and three doses (6, 12, and 23 mg) of the novel selective cholinergic channel activator (ChCA) (nicotinic agonist) ABT-418 over 6 h in a double-blind, within-subjects, repeated-measures design. Subjects showed significant improvements in total recall and a decline in recall failure on a verbal learning task. Qualitatively similar improvements were seen in non-verbal learning tasks such as spatial learning and memory, and repeated acquisition. No significant behavioral, vital sign, or physical side effects were seen. These results confirm that stimulating central nicotinic receptors has acute cognitive benefit in AD patients. These findings suggest that selective ChCAs have a potential therapeutic role in dementing disorders, and that further studies with this or similar agents in AD and/or Parkinson's disease are warranted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s002130050897

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Agonists selective for α4β2* nAChRs produce more robust and clinically promising enhancement of attention and related cognitive abilities than nicotine.

    “Recent studies have indicated that agonists selective for α4β2* nAChRs produce perhaps more robust and clinically more promising enhancement of attention and related cognitive abilities (Potter et al, 1999; Wilens et al, 1999; Wilens et al, 2006; Dunbar et al, 2007; Wilens and Decker, 2007).”

    From Modes and models of forebrain cholinergic neuromodulation of cognition (2011) · cites this paper as Potter et al, 1999

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Potter, A., Corwin, J., Lang, J., Piasecki, M., Lenox, R., & Newhouse, P. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Vermont (US)
  • New York University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
1999-03-17
Volume
142
Issue
4
Pages
334-342
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W2038095204
Cited by
163
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
4.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Abbott Laboratories
  • U.S. Public Health Service (R29-46625, M01-00109)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
Keywords
ABT-418, nicotinic agonists, Alzheimer's disease, nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, cognitive enhancement, verbal learning, spatial learning and memory, memory retrieval, dementia, acute drug effects
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Cognition, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Isoxazoles, Learning, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Prolactin, Psychomotor Performance, Pyrrolidines, Nicotinic Agonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review