The DOI matches its Crossref record.
EFFECT OF 6-HYDROXYDOPAMINE AND SOME OTHER COMPOUNDS ON THE CONCENTRATION OF NOREPINEPHRINE IN THE HEARTS OF MICE
Abstract
Some compounds were examined for potency in depleting mouse heart norepinephrine, which was measured 16 hours (or 1 hour for tyramine) after intraperitoneal drug administration. These compounds, in order of increasing ED50's (dose, in mg/kg, required to half deplete heart norepinephrine) were: reserpine, metaraminol, 6-hydroxydopamine (2,4,5-trihydroxyphenethylamine), guanethidine and tyramine. After administration of equipotent doses of the compounds, heart norepinephrine returned to normal with widely varying rates. Most rapid repletion occurred after tyramine, followed in order by guanethidine, metaraminol, reserpine and 6-hydroxydopamine. Tyramine, administered 1 hour previously, blocked the longer-lasting depletion of heart norepinephrine by 6-hydroxydopamine, but not by metaraminol, guanethidine and reserpine. Under similar conditions, guanethidine blocked 6-hydroxydopamine and reserpine, but not metaraminol; and metaraminol blocked 6-hydroxydopamine. A second suboptimal dose of reserpine, guanethidine or metaraminol, administered 1 day after a first dose, produced additional depletion of heart norepinephrine. However, a second dose of 6-hydroxydopamine produced no additional effect unless it was larger than the first dose. Consecutive dosing, at a 1-day interval, with reserpine, guanethidine and 6-hydroxydopamine, in any combination of two in either sequence, produced additive depletion of heart norepinephrine. The data can be interpreted, within the framework of the two-pool concept of norepinephrine storage, as follows: 1. Reserpine releases norepinephrine by acting upon pool 1; guanethidine, like bretylium, blocks the action of reserpine on this pool, but does not itself release norepinephrine from pool 1. 2. Tyramine, guanethidine and metaraminol, in order of increasing affinity for norepinephrine binding sites, release the amine through pool 2. 3. 6-Hydroxydopamine, although possessing less affinity for binding sites of pool 2 than tyramine, metaraminol and guanethidine, destroys or alters the binding sites in such a way that they must be replaced.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Blum, D., Torch, S., Lambeng, N., Nissou, M.-F., Benabid, A.-L., Sadoul, R., & Verna, J.-M. (2001) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0082(01)00003-x · Cited by 1,246
Classic toxin-induced animal models of Parkinson?s disease: 6-OHDA and MPTP
Schober, A. (2004) · Cell and Tissue Research · doi:10.1007/s00441-004-0938-y · Cited by 803
Depletion of brain noradrenaline and dopamine by 6‐hydroxydopamine
BREESE, G. R., & TRAYLOR, T. D. (1971) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.1971.tb07089.x · Cited by 527
Gerlach, M., & Riederer, P. (1996) · Journal of Neural Transmission · doi:10.1007/bf01291788 · Cited by 498
A Guide to Neurotoxic Animal Models of Parkinson's Disease
Tieu, K. (2011) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a009316 · Cited by 483
Metadata
- Authors
- Porter, C. C., Totaro, J. A., & Stone, C. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1963-06
- Volume
- 140
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 308-316
- ISSN
- 0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2272737569
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EFFECT OF 6-HYDROXYDOPAMINE AND SOME OTHER COMPOUNDS ON THE CONCENTRATION OF NOREPINEPHRINE IN THE HEARTS OF MICE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)26555-7
- The paper
- Porter, C. C., Totaro, J. A., & Stone, C. A. (1963). EFFECT OF 6-HYDROXYDOPAMINE AND SOME OTHER COMPOUNDS ON THE CONCENTRATION OF NOREPINEPHRINE IN THE HEARTS OF MICE. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)26555-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.