Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 198

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

ACTIONS AND INTERACTIONS OF NOREPINEPHRINE, TYRAMINE AND COCAINE ON AORTIC STRIPS OF RABBIT AND LEFT ATRIA OF GUINEA PIG AND CAT

Furchgott, Robert F., Kirpekar, S.M., Rieker, Maria, Schwab, Albert·1963·The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Abstract

The actions and interactions of norepinephrine (NE), tyramine and cocaine were studied on strips of thoracic aorta from rabbits and on electrically driven left atria from guinea pigs. On preparations from normal animals cocaine at 10-5 caused an increase in sensitivity to NE (much greater in atria) and a decrease in sensitivity to tyramine (much greater in aortic strips). Cocaine also potentiated the positive inotropic response of atria to "supramaximal voltage" stimulation (presumably stimulation of intramural sympathetic nerves). Cocaine alone produced a small to moderate positive inotropic response in most atria, but no response in aortic strips. Atria and aortic strips from reserpine-treated animals showed only small increases in sensitivity to NE over that of normal preparations. Reserpinized atria did not respond to either tyramine or cocaine, and gave very little or no positive inotropic response to supramaximal voltage stimulation. Reserpinized strips were very insensitive to tyramine, giving contractions only at very high concentrations. Such contractions were not antagonized by cocaine, and are thought to result from a direct action of tyramine rather than an indirect action dependent on NE release. Cocaine potentiated the responses to NE on reserpinized preparations almost as much as on normal preparations. Tyramine at high concentrations potentiated responses to NE on reserpinized preparations to the same degree as did cocaine. Incubation of reserpinized preparations with sufficient NE for short periods (NE "repletion") led to restoration of essentially normal sensitivity to tyramine. On continued exposure to tyramine, the restored sensitivity was lost, but could be restored again by reincubation with NE. Incubation of reserpinized atria with NE also restored sensitivity to cocaine to above the normal level, but failed completely to restore the sensitivity to supramaximal voltage stimulation. If either tyramine or cocaine was present in high concentrations during the period of incubation with NE, the restoration of sensitivity to either agent was blocked. Normal and reserpinized left atria of cats behaved qualitatively like those of guinea pigs, except that cocaine alone had no positive inotropic action on cat atria, and in moderately high concentrations had a strong depressing action. On left atria of cats, 6 to 10 days after bilateral stellate ganglionectomy, the sensitivity to NE was elevated above the normal level, and was increased relatively little or not at all by cocaine. Sensitivities to tyramine and to supramaximal voltage stimulation, though considerably decreased, were not completely lost—probably indicating that the ganglionectomy did not produce a total cardiac sympathectomy. The present results have been discussed in conjunction with the recent findings of others. A hypothetical scheme has been developed for the relationship between effector cells and structures, possibly adrenergic nerve terminals, which remove NE either by storage (dominant normally) or enzymatic inactivation (dominant after reserpine). It is proposed that these latter structures contain at least two types of storage sites for NE, and that they possess on their exterior sites of a specific type with which NE molecules and tyramine molecules (for the most part) must first combine before being transferred into the interior. Cocaine molecules, by also combining with these "transfer sites," competitively block the uptake of both NE and tyramine, thus potentiating the response to the former and antagonizing the release of NE by the latter.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-3565(25)26637-x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 198

Metadata

Authors
Furchgott, R. F., Kirpekar, S. M., Rieker, M., & Schwab, A.
Venue
The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1963-10
Volume
142
Issue
1
Pages
39-58
ISSN
0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2258402649
Cited by
198
References
0
FWCI
5.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ACTIONS AND INTERACTIONS OF NOREPINEPHRINE, TYRAMINE AND COCAINE ON AORTIC STRIPS OF RABBIT AND LEFT ATRIA OF GUINEA PIG AND CAT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)26637-x
The paper
Furchgott, R. F., Kirpekar, S. M., Rieker, M., & Schwab, A. (1963). ACTIONS AND INTERACTIONS OF NOREPINEPHRINE, TYRAMINE AND COCAINE ON AORTIC STRIPS OF RABBIT AND LEFT ATRIA OF GUINEA PIG AND CAT. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)26637-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.