Cited by 107Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and ProtectionSulfur Compounds in BiologyGlutathione Transferases and Polymorphisms

The effects of age and glutathione depletion on hepatic glutathione turnover in vivo determined by acetaminophen probe analysis.

Lauterburg, B H, Vaishnav, Y, Stillwell, W G, Mitchell, J R·1980·The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Abstract

We have validated a method to assess hepatic glutathione turnover in individual animals in vivo. This method would be applicable to man by collection of bile samples via nasoduodenal intubation. The rate of glutathione turnover was calculated from the time course of the specific activity of the glutathione-acetaminophen adduct in bile after the administration of a radiolabeled glutathione precursor and a small dose of acetaminophen. Identical results were obtained with radiolabeled glutathione or with radiolabeled cysteine, glutamic acid or glycine as the precursors. The small dose of acetaminophen administered to trap glutathione as an excretable adduct did not stimulate glutathione turnover, which reflects glutathione synthesis under steady-state conditions. No evidence for two pools of glutathione with different half-lives was found; previous reports of two glutathione pools may have failed to account for hepatic protein turnover with subsequent release of radiolabeled amino acids for glutathione synthesis. In male rats, the rate of glutathione turnover decreased from 0.52 per hr at 6 weeks of age to 0.12 per hr at 24 weeks of age. After acute depletion of glutathione by diethylmaleate, the rate of glutathione turnover promptly doubled in all age groups. Similar increases in the rate of glutathione synthesis and in the ability to stimulate glutathione production in response to acute depletion in children might explain their decreased susceptibility to acetaminophen hepatot…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-3565(25)32018-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A likely explanation is that children have greater glutathione supply and regenerative capacity.

    “A likely explanation would be the increased glutathione supply and regenerative capacity of children (117).”

    From Paracetamol: New Vistas of an Old Drug (2006) · cites this paper as [117]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lauterburg, B. H., Vaishnav, Y., Stillwell, W. G., & Mitchell, J. R.
Venue
The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1980-04
Volume
213
Issue
1
Pages
54-58
ISSN
0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1886597719
Cited by
107
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Sulfur Compounds in Biology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Glutathione Transferases and Polymorphisms
Keywords
paracetamol, glutathione depletion, diethyl maleate, age effects, acetaminophen hepatotoxicity, bile, glutathione synthesis, cysteine precursor
MeSH terms
Acetaminophen, Aging, Animals, Glutathione, Kinetics, Liver, Male, Maleates, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review