Cited by 147Pharmaceutical studies and practicesPediatric Pain Management TechniquesAnesthesia and Pain Management

Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of rectally administered paracetamol in preterm neonates: Presented in part at the annual meeting of the European Society for Pediatric Research, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, July 3–6 1994.

Open access
van Lingen, R A, Deinum, J T, Quak, J M E, Kuizenga, A J, van Dam, J G, Anand, K J S, Tibboel, D, Okken, A·1999·Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and dose–response relation of a single rectal dose of paracetamol in preterm infants in two different age groups. Methods—Preterm infants stratified by gestational age groups 28–32 weeks (group 1) and 32–36 weeks (group 2) undergoing painful procedures were included in this study. Pain was assessed using a modified facies pain score. Results—Twenty one infants in group 1 and seven in group 2 were given a single rectal dose of 20 mg/kg body weight. Therapeutic concentrations were reached in 16/21 and 1/7 infants in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Peak serum concentrations were significantly higher in group 1. Median time to reach peak concentrations was similar in the two groups. As serum concentration was still in the therapeutic range for some infants in group 1, elimination half life (T ½) could not be determined in all infants: T ½ was 11.0 ± 5.7 in 11 infants in group 1 and 4.8 ± 1.2 hours in group 2. Urinary excretion was mainly as paracetamol sulphate. The glucuronide:sulphate ratio was 0.12 ± 0.09 (group 1) and 0.28 ± 0.35 (group 2). The pain score did not correlate with therapeutic concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: A 20 mg/kg single dose of paracetamol can be safely given to preterm infants in whom sulphation is the major pathway of excretion. Multiple doses in 28–32 week old neonates would require an interval of more than 8 hours to prevent progressively increasing serum concentrations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/fn.80.1.f59

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In premature neonates, one study found mean elimination half-life of rectally administered paracetamol was 11 hours for 28-32 week neonates and 4-5 hours for 32-36 week neonates.

    “In premature neonates, the mean elimination half-life is longer still; one study found it was 11 h for 28-32 week old neonates (for rectally administered paracetamol) and 4-5 h in 32-36 week old neonates.7”

    From Paracetamol: pharmacology, prescribing and controversies (2016) · cites this paper as [7]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [12]12. McGrath PA, de Veber LL, Hearn MT. Multidimensional pain assessment in children. Adv Pain Res Ther 1985;9:387-93.
  2. [29]29. Rane A, Sjöqvist F, Orrenius S. Drug and fetal metabolism. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1973;14:666-72.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Lingen, R. A., Deinum, J. T., Quak, J. M. E., Kuizenga, A. J., van Dam, J. G., Anand, K. J. S., Tibboel, D., & Okken, A.
Affiliations
Arkansas Children's Hospital (US)
Venue
Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1999-01-01
Volume
80
Issue
1
Pages
F59-F63
ISSN
  • 1359-2998 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2052
OpenAlex
W2038191147
Cited by
147
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
Keywords
paracetamol, rectal administration, preterm infants, pharmacokinetics, drug metabolism, sulfation, glucuronidation, elimination half-life, dose-response relationship, neonatal pain, analgesia, gestational age
MeSH terms
Acetaminophen, Administration, Rectal, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Gestational Age, Half-Life, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Male, Pain Measurement, Regression Analysis, Time Factors, Statistics, Nonparametric, Analgesics, Non-Narcotic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review