Intragastric self-administration in the rhesus monkey: a comparison of the reinforcing effects of codeine, phenacetin and paracetamol.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other aniline analgesics, acetanilide and phenacetin, produce the same subjective effects.
“These effects are shared by the other members of the”
From Paracetamol: New Vistas of an Old Drug (2006) · cites this paper as [101]
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Paracetamol: New Vistas of an Old Drug
Bertolini, A., Ferrari, A., Ottani, A., Guerzoni, S., Tacchi, R., & Leone, S. (2006) · CNS Drug Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1527-3458.2006.00250.x · Cited by 654 · see citing works
Meisch, R. A., & Lemaire, G. A. (1993) · Techniques in the behavioral and neural sciences · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-81444-9.50016-x · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Phenacetin, acetaminophen and dipyrone: analgesic and rewarding effects
Abbott, F. V., & Hellemans, K. G. C. (2000) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(00)00179-0 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Young, A. M., Swain, H. H., & Woods, J. H. (1981) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf00432741 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Woolverton, W. L., & Schuster, C. R. (1983) · Journal of Pharmacological Methods · doi:10.1016/0160-5402(83)90072-4 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Ethanol as a Reinforcer: Comparison with Other Drugs
Winger, G. D., Young, A. M., & Woods, J. H. (1983) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-3518-4_5 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Possible Pharmacological Mechanisms of Chronic Abuse of Analgesics and Other Antimigraine Drugs
HOROWSKI, R., & Ziegler, A. R. (1988) · Advances in applied neurological sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-73327-7_12 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Mucosal Melanoma: Mechanisms of Its Etiology, Progression, Resistance and Therapy
Hassan, S.-Y., Flanagan, T. W., Hassan, S.-L., Facca, S., Haïkel, Y., & Hassan, M. (2025) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells14231884 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
The neurobiological and behavioral impacts of adulterants in drugs of abuse
Hochstetler, M. J., Dodge, A., & Mitra, S. (2025) · Brain Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.dscb.2025.100296 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hoffmeister, F., Dycka, J., & Rämsch, K.
- Venue
- The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1980-07
- Volume
- 214
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 213-218
- ISSN
- 0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2431556464
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 0.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
- Keywords
- codeine, phenacetin, paracetamol, opioid reinforcement, rhesus monkeys, self-administration
- MeSH terms
- Acetaminophen, Animals, Haplorhini, Codeine, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Humans, Individuality, Intestinal Absorption, Macaca mulatta, Male, Phenacetin, Reinforcement, Psychology, Stomach, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
