The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Characterization of typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs based on in vivo occupancy of serotonin2 and dopamine2 receptors.
Abstract
Atypical antipsychotic drugs related to clozapine may be distinguishable from typical antipsychotic drugs by having a greater potency in vitro at serotonin2 (5-HT2) receptors relative to dopamine2 (D2) receptors. The in vivo potencies of 10 typical and 10 putative atypical antipsychotic drugs in occupying D2 and 5-HT2 receptors in rat brain are reported here. There is no significant difference in the average potency of the two groups of antipsychotic drugs in preventing the in vivo binding of N-[3H] methylspiperone to 5-HT2 receptors in the cortex. However, the average potency of the atypical antipsychotic drugs is about 8-fold less than typical antipsychotic drugs in preventing N-[3H] methylspiperone binding to D2 receptors in the striatum. Thus, all of the atypical antipsychotic drugs that are clozapine-like have a greater relative affinity in vivo for the 5-HT2 than the D2 receptor. As a group, the typical antipsychotic drugs tend to be equipotent at both receptors. The average relative potency of the group of typical antipsychotic drugs at 5-HT2 vs. D2 receptors is essentially equal when examined in vivo vs. in vitro. Atypical antipsychotic drugs are slightly but significantly more potent in vivo at D2 receptors in the olfactory tubercle than the striatum. For only the typical antipsychotic drugs, the in vivo and in vitro potencies in occupying D2 receptors are correlated with their average clinical dosage. Thus, the relative in vivo potency of clozapine-related drugs at 5-HT2 vs. D2 receptors may help identify these compounds as atypical antipsychotic drugs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kapur, S., & Seeman, P. (2001) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.158.3.360 · Cited by 1,140
The Effects of Clozapine, Risperidone, and Olanzapine on Cognitive Function in Schizophrenia
Meltzer, H. Y., & McGurk, S. R. (1999) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a033376 · Cited by 1,020
Self-citationKrystal, J. H., D'Souza, D. C., Mathalon, D., Perry, E., Belger, A., & Hoffman, R. (2003) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-003-1582-z · Cited by 530
Ichikawa, J., Ishii, H., Bonaccorso, S., Fowler, W. L., O'Laughlin, I. A., & Meltzer, H. Y. (2001) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00154.x · Cited by 494
Self-citationDisease-specific changes in regulator of G-protein signaling 4 (RGS4) expression in schizophrenia
Mirnics, K., Middleton, F. A., Stanwood, G. D., Lewis, D. A., & Levitt, P. (2001) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/sj.mp.4000866 · Cited by 446
Metadata
- Authors
- Stockmeier, C. A., DiCarlo, J. J., Zhang, Y., Thompson, P., & Meltzer, H. Y.
- Venue
- The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1993-07
- Volume
- 266
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1374-1384
- ISSN
- 0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2280261174
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs based on in vivo occupancy of serotonin2 and dopamine2 receptors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)39339-0
- The paper
- Stockmeier, C. A., DiCarlo, J. J., Zhang, Y., Thompson, P., & Meltzer, H. Y. (1993). Characterization of typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs based on in vivo occupancy of serotonin2 and dopamine2 receptors. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)39339-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.